On 06/26/2018 10:21 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
And if you are not using AD you can use SIG(0) and KEY records to allow
hosts to authenticate updates to the DNS for their own records.
I'm not quite following. Do you mean that you can allow hosts to update
their own RRs without requiring AD and us
And if you are not using AD you can use SIG(0) and KEY records
to allow hosts to authenticate updates to the DNS for their own
records.
Instead of registering a host with AD you add a KEY record into
the DNS which has the public key of the host which is to be used
to sign the UPDATE requests. Unf
On 06/26/2018 06:21 PM, Elias Pereira wrote:
yes. :)
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Naming_FAQ#Why_This_Matters
Hum.
After reading that section of the page you linked to, I'm not convinced
that the DNS /must/ be on the Samba server.
How would this work in the scenario I
>
> Is that truly a requirement?
> Is this not the same with Samba? Is there something specific about
> Samba that does require it to be authoritative for the zone?
yes. :)
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Naming_FAQ#Why_This_Matters
But I know that Windows servers just
> need
On 06/26/2018 05:20 PM, Elias Pereira wrote:
since the samba needs to be authoritative on its own dns.
Is that truly a requirement?
I've not messed with AD on Samba. But I know that Windows servers just
need the ability to update DNS. They do not need to be authoritative
for it.
Is this
Spammers on the bind list? Lol
@Reindl Harald
Thanks for the answer!! I'll take a look!
@John Miller
compay.intra is a example domain. :)
In our institution we have a valid domain and we belong to an educational
institution group. The institution is company.intra and that will provision
a samba4
Most of your replies seem not to address the (immediately
preceding) paragraph they appear to be responding to.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 22:15:07 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 25.06.2018 um 22:01 schrieb Paul Kosinski:
> > Somebody who has irresponsibly (and apparently wantonly, given his
>
Hi Elias,
Generally not. Unless .intra is a valid top-level-domain, and
company.intra is registered with the .intra registrars, your external
DNS will need to be different. And in any case, you probably want
your public Internet presence to reflect your actual company name and
be in a TLD that p
Hello,
My external DNS can be a subdomain of my root domain?
Eg:
root domain: company.intra
external dns: named.company.intra
--
Elias Pereira
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-user
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 11:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.06.2018 um 20:50 schrieb Dave Warren:
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 11:47, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 26.06.2018 um 20:36 schrieb Dave Warren:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 11:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Grant Taylor via bind-users <
bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
>
> Are you saying that you want to dynamically update routes to IPs resolved
> in real time to specific host / domain names? Such that traffic to
> specific hosts / domain names is routed over DSL? W
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 11:47, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.06.2018 um 20:36 schrieb Dave Warren:
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 11:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 26.06.2018 um 20:18 schrieb Dave Warren:
> >>> At the end of the day, I doubt there is much you can do legally, the onl
Hi All,
I doubt any legal action would have any chance, of cause depending on
the country's law your using. The server is publicly accessible.
It's like prosecuting somebody for knocking on your public front door
to ask the way. (or for that matter salespeople) You only might have a
chance to put
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 11:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.06.2018 um 20:18 schrieb Dave Warren:
> > At the end of the day, I doubt there is much you can do legally, the only
> > real solutions are technical by returning answers that will discourage
> > resolvers from asking as frequently
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:45 PM Grant Taylor via bind-users <
bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
> On 06/25/2018 11:08 PM, Dale Mahalko wrote:
> > * The secondary program looks up the domain in a database, which also
> > includes the multihome destination for each domain. If a match is found,
> > a
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 01:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 25.06.18 09:06, Dave Warren wrote:
> >Absent a situation where the customer has agreed to purchase this service,
> > the only result sending an invoice would have is that you have increased
> > your loss by adding wasted time, toner
On 06/25/2018 11:08 PM, Dale Mahalko wrote:
* The secondary program looks up the domain in a database, which also
includes the multihome destination for each domain. If a match is found,
a route is created to that multihome destination. Aliased acceleration
domains such as Akamai will be matche
26.06.2018, 16:31, "Mohammed Ejaz" :I am using bind I have problem in resolving my domain cyberia.net.sa over the internet. Whereas it is working fine internally. Any clue would be highly appeicated. Hello, I don't seen problem, DNS resolution is being done and which do you use DNS resolver? R
In article ,
Paul Kosinski wrote:
> Somebody who has irresponsibly (and apparently wantonly, given his
> refusal to fix it) delegated his domain(s) to your DNS server is
> essentially causing a (modest bandwidth) distributed denial of service
> attack on your server. I don't think that the "resp
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 03:36:25PM +0200,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote
a message of 19 lines which said:
> Some web DNS checkers do great job.
And some are really bad and/or broken. Let's mention the right ones:
https://dnsviz.net/
https://zonemaster.net/
___
On 26.06.18 14:08, Mohammed Ejaz wrote:
I am using bind I have problem in resolving my domain cyberia.net.sa over
the internet. Whereas it is working fine internally. Any clue would be
highly appeicated.
try doing internet search for "dns checker" and try put your domain into
two-three of them
You're going to have to provide more information than that. What isn't
working from your internet perspective?
Looks fine from where I'm sitting.
; <<>> DiG 9.11.2-P1 <<>> cyberia.net.sa
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4586
;; flags: qr
I am using bind I have problem in resolving my domain cyberia.net.sa over
the internet. Whereas it is working fine internally. Any clue would be
highly appeicated.
Thanks,
Mohammed Ejaz
Asst. Operation Director of Systems.
Cyberia SAUDI ARABIA
P.O.Box: 301079, Riyadh 11372
Phone: (+966)
I should also mention that I am not a formally trained programmer. I am
mostly an end-user looking for a readymade solution that doesn't require
understanding the source and recompiling it.
I can dabble, but I do not know all the intricacies of C/C++ to implement
with any level of stability or qua
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 04:30:08PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> We had a former customer who parked about 300 domains with his
> registry on our server but is no longer a customer and hasn't moved
> his domains. There aren't any hosts behind the domains.
>
> Is there anything more I can do to block/preven
Why send it to a secondary program? Just have named look the name up
in the database directly and then use a route socket to inject the
route. Named already uses a route socket to track interfaces coming
and going.
Note: CDN’s use the same machine for multiple names so you may not always
get the
26 matches
Mail list logo
