Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
> I have now set
> max-journal-size 50M;
> and restartet bind a few times. But the journal files are still GBytes.
> When should Bind flush the journal into the zone file?
I think `rndc sync` should do what you want. I can't remember what the
internal triggers for
Thanks Matus,
The below tips fixed things ;). I did make a mistake on the zone entry.
Best Regards,
Chris W.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 7:53 AM
To: bind-users@lists.is
On 14.03.18 04:44, Chris Wilson wrote:
I just recently upgraded one of our servers to bind 9.9, and I'm having some
issues.
We have a legacy software application running that likes to see both
forward/reverse dns, however since the upgrade reverse dns is no longer
working. We have this server wo
Am 14.03.2018 um 13:38 schrieb Tony Finch:
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the detailed answer. So I will use a few MBytes. But would it
>> be possible to set max-journal-size=0?
>
> There's a minimum journal size (the calculation in the code comes to about
> 1KB I think), so if you se
Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
> Thanks for the detailed answer. So I will use a few MBytes. But would it
> be possible to set max-journal-size=0?
There's a minimum journal size (the calculation in the code comes to about
1KB I think), so if you set max-journal-size to 0 (or any other tiny
value) it is
Am 14.03.2018 um 13:04 schrieb Tony Finch:
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>
>> But on a server with slave-zone only (fetched by ixfr) - do I need a
>> journal at all? How can I disable it - by setting the max-size to 0?
>
> The journal reduces the cost of re-writing zone files: basically, the IXFR
>
Am 14.03.2018 um 13:10 schrieb Ray Bellis:
> On 14/03/2018 12:08, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
>
>> Not that I know of. The amount of RAM in a server is probably the most
>> significant limit for loading zones into BIND.
>
> Anand is correct - there's no intrinsic limit other than RAM.
>
> I personal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
> I couldn't find it online - is there a limit on the zone file size?
Look for the max-records option. This was added in response to
CVE-2016-6170 https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01390
The extra accounting that was implemented to support max-records is also
used for the aut
On 14/03/2018 12:08, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> Not that I know of. The amount of RAM in a server is probably the most
> significant limit for loading zones into BIND.
Anand is correct - there's no intrinsic limit other than RAM.
I personally know of BIND instances running with in the region of 25
On 14/03/2018 12:54, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I couldn't find it online - is there a limit on the zone file size?
Not that I know of. The amount of RAM in a server is probably the most
significant limit for loading zones into BIND.
Regards,
Anand
_
Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
> But on a server with slave-zone only (fetched by ixfr) - do I need a
> journal at all? How can I disable it - by setting the max-size to 0?
The journal reduces the cost of re-writing zone files: basically, the IXFR
just gets appended to the journal, which is relatively c
Hi!
I couldn't find it online - is there a limit on the zone file size?
Thanks
Klaus
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.or
Stelzner, Tore wrote:
>
> For KSK updates and rollovers we use some scripts by a third company
> that work with the API of the domain reseller. At the moment it seems to
> be very specific for the API of this reseller and so nothing to share.
What I would like is a set of tools with a common user
Hi!
The default setting of max-journal-size filled my disk. I do have plenty
of zone from KByte to GByte. So I wonder, what would be the perfect size
to configure. So, I wondered - do I need a journal at all? I know the
journal is needed for ixfr-from-differences and DDNS.
But on a server with sl
Oli Schacher wrote:
> On 14.03.18 09:37, Carsten Strotmann wrote:
> >
> > I hope there will be more adoption of this protocol from other TLDs.
>
> .ch/.li is currently implementing it and I hope we'll be able to go live
> this year.
Awesomeness :-)
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
On 14.03.18 09:37, Carsten Strotmann wrote:
> Thanks, I've got a ".cz" domain and will start some testing ;)
>
> I hope there will be more adoption of this protocol from other TLDs.
.ch/.li is currently implementing it and I hope we'll be able to go live
this year.
Best regards
Oli
_
Hello Everyone,
I just recently upgraded one of our servers to bind 9.9, and I'm having some
issues.
We have a legacy software application running that likes to see both
forward/reverse dns, however since the upgrade reverse dns is no longer
working. We have this server working with DHCPD
Hi all,
My server is a caching-only server, and provides recursive service with
"minimal-response YES". when i digged some domain name, my server answered
with all fields « ADDITIONAL RECORDS » and « AUTHORITATIVE NAMESERVERS »
fill with the DNS root server. I think this is WRONG and useless.
Hi all,
My server is a caching-only server, and provides recursive service with
"minimal-response YES". when i digged some domain name, my server answered
with all fields « ADDITIONAL RECORDS » and « AUTHORITATIVE NAMESERVERS »
fill with the DNS root server. I think this is WRONG and useless.
Hi all,My server is a caching-only server, and provides recursive service
with "minimal-response YES". when i digged some domain name, my server
answered with all fields « ADDITIONAL RECORDS » and « AUTHORITATIVE
NAMESERVERS » fill with the DNS root server. I think this is WRONG and
useless.Ju
Hello Stephane,
Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:52:50AM +0100,
> Carsten Strotmann wrote
> a message of 19 lines which said:
>
>> is automatic DNSSEC Delegation Trust Maintenance (RFC 7344/8078)
>> already support at the TLD level somewhere? I know it is implemented
>
Hello,
we use dnssec-keymgr for the key management and it is really helpful. My
current feature request would be wildcards in the config file but maybe it is
already there as I still have to check the updates brought by Bind 9.12.
For KSK updates and rollovers we use some scripts by a third comp
22 matches
Mail list logo
