Please ignore -- just testing post mailman upgrade.
Best,
-Dan Mahoney
ISC Operations Group
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists
Thanks Evan for answering my questions. I will look more into getdns-api or
libunbund library for the client side resolve.
Rgds
Simon
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 01:33:10PM -0800, SIMON BABY wrote:
> > 1. Assume if I use an external recursive reso
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 01:33:10PM -0800, SIMON BABY wrote:
> 1. Assume if I use an external recursive resolver and if that resolver does
> not support DNSSEC, how can I validate the signature?
Depends what you mean by supporting DNSSEC; see below.
> 2. If I use an external resolver and if a hack
Thanks Warren. I will look into https://getdnsapi.net/ .
Rgds
simon
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:42 PM, SIMON BABY wrote:
> > Hello Evan,
> >
> > Thank you so much for the quick response.
> >
> > My requirement is to implement only the rec
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:42 PM, SIMON BABY wrote:
> Hello Evan,
>
> Thank you so much for the quick response.
>
> My requirement is to implement only the recursive resolve and validation
> part of the DNSSEC in my client application. Our CPU and memory are very
> limited. So I am not sure I can g
Hello Evan,
Thanks you so much for answering my questions. Inline my comments.
But why do you need your application to contain a recursive resolver?
1. Assume if I use an external recursive resolver and if that resolver does
not support DNSSEC, how can I validate the signature?
2. If I use an e
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:42:26PM -0800, SIMON BABY wrote:
> My requirement is to implement only the recursive resolve and validation
> part of the DNSSEC in my client application. Our CPU and memory are very
> limited. So I am not sure I can go and use BIND 9.
But why do you need your applicatio
Hello Evan,
Thank you so much for the quick response.
My requirement is to implement only the recursive resolve and validation
part of the DNSSEC in my client application. Our CPU and memory are very
limited. So I am not sure I can go and use BIND 9.
With BIND 9, can I integrate the library in m
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:08:18PM -0800, SIMON BABY wrote:
> I am trying to implement the full recursive resolver with libbind library
> in my client code. I am not using resolv.conf in my implementation. Can
> anyone please help to point any sample code for this.
Not even BIND uses libbind anymo
Hello,
I am trying to implement the full recursive resolver with libbind library
in my client code. I am not using resolv.conf in my implementation. Can
anyone please help to point any sample code for this.
Thank you for your help and time.
Rgds
simon
___
Irwin Tillman wrote:
>
> When my server is running BIND 9.9.11, it returns an answer with the
> authority section populated.
>
> But when I upgrade my server to BIND 9.11.2, the same lookup
> performed immediately after I start my server returns no authority records,
> which is a surprise to me:
I'm preparing to upgrade from BIND 9.9.11 to 9.11.2.
I notice a difference in how named populates the authority section in some
responses,
and am trying to understand if it's OK.
My server is a caching-only server, and provides recursive service.
For some zones, my server is configured to forwa
Am 12.02.2018 um 20:36 schrieb wbr...@e1b.org:
From: "Reindl Harald"
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
the ISP has no business to touch any package bewteen source and me
because he can't know the implications - he even must not know about
them because it#s not his business
And yet they do (Su
Am 10.02.2018 um 05:11 schrieb John Levine:
But to answer your question, off-hand, I'd say that any TTL under 60s is =
suspicious and any TTL under 10s is almost certainly intentionally =
abusive.
I hope you're not planning to do much spam filtering
i do for years with a min-ttl of 90 secod
14 matches
Mail list logo
