Does the lone DNS server even respond on the local network? Do you see
DNS traffic flowing to that server?
Time for the divide and conquer method of troubleshooting to find where
the failure is occurring.
Good luck.
Confidentiality Notice:
This electronic message and any attachments may c
Am 21.11.2017 um 18:05 schrieb Ron Wingfield:
. . .well, I never expected to get "flamed" as by GED, "/As a general
observation, not knowing what you're doing is dangerous
on the Internet. Please take some time out of your undoubtedly busy
life to try to ensure that you aren't a menace to the
Am 21.11.2017 um 14:42 schrieb G.W. Haywood via bind-users:
The address for localhost (127.0.0.1) should be in /etc/hosts,
not in your zone file, and very probably it already is
On 21.11.17 15:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
that part is not true
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1537 says:
Note that a
On 11/21/17 12:05 PM, Ron Wingfield wrote:
> . . .well, I never expected to get "flamed" as by GED, "/As a general
> observation, not knowing what you're doing is dangerous
> on the Internet. Please take some time out of your undoubtedly busy
> life to try to ensure that you aren't a menace to t
. . .well, I never expected to get "flamed" as by GED, "
*As a general observation, not knowing what you're doing is dangerous on
the Internet. Please take some time out of your undoubtedly busy life to
try to ensure that you aren't a menace to the rest of us. A good start
might be to read the f
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> interesting - but however "administrators often mistakenly drop the trailing
> dot" is nonsense
Yeah that's irrelevant, but it doesn't change the conclusion that
localhost entries in zones are harmful and unnecessary.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ - I
Am 21.11.2017 um 15:27 schrieb Tony Finch:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.11.2017 um 14:42 schrieb G.W. Haywood via bind-users:
The address for localhost (127.0.0.1) should be in /etc/hosts,
not in your zone file, and very probably it already is
that part is not true
https://tools.ietf.org/ht
On 17-Nov-17 18:04, Mark Andrews wrote:
> DYN used to just require a TSIG signed update request set to a server
> specified in
> a SRV record.
Depends on which service. The one I referred to is the one that was
popular (free) for people who wanted to reach a machine on a dynamic IP
address. Beca
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 21.11.2017 um 14:42 schrieb G.W. Haywood via bind-users:
> > The address for localhost (127.0.0.1) should be in /etc/hosts,
> > not in your zone file, and very probably it already is
>
> that part is not true
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1537 says:
> Note that all d
Am 21.11.2017 um 14:42 schrieb G.W. Haywood via bind-users:
The address for localhost (127.0.0.1) should be in /etc/hosts,
not in your zone file, and very probably it already is
that part is not true
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1537 says:
Note that all domains that contain hosts should ha
Hi there,
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Ron Wingfield wrote:
... our registered domain, archaxis.net, is not resolving ...
As has been mentioned, you don't have a nameserver listening on IP
162.202.233.81. At a guess, you need to restart it.
We run BIND version 9.10.2 ...
Upgrade. See for exampl
11 matches
Mail list logo