-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source
rpms, and build instructions.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREKAAYFAllVdXcACgkQL6j7milTFsG/SQCggBDFBEwmgOb92nESct8cg3IS
gOoAn2KXPunBCbmHxvc
Today ISC announced two significant BIND vulnerabilities (via our
bind-announce list -- https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-announce)
They are CVE-2017-3142 and CVE-2017-3143 and both are related to
errors in our TSIG support. These are unusual CVEs for BIND --
many of the vulnerabilities
Hi Bob,
> I tend to distrust "CPU(30%)" if it is averaged over more than one
> cpu. Could you run "top" and hit the number "1" so that it shows each
> cpu separately? With 8 cpu's, "30%" could be one cpu at 100% and others
> lower, where the one cpu at 100% is your bottleneck.
I checked that w
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Marc Richter
wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> > Do you have any adjustments in /etc/system ?
>
> No. And as mentioned before this is a Solaris 11 system, so /etc/system is
> (mostly) irrelevant, as the IP settings are all done with ipadm now.
>
> >
> > # ndd -get /dev/ip \
Hi Mukund,
Yes, I will send the report with a sample RPZ zone that contains the name to
bind-b...@isc.org.
Thanks,
Jim
On 6/29/17, 2:40 PM, "Mukund Sivaraman" wrote:
Hi Jim
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 01:57:16PM +, Jim Yang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the DNS name label
Hi Jim
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 01:57:16PM +, Jim Yang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the DNS name label length limit? As per RFC 1035, it is 63
> characters. I tested a few DNS names that contains a label that is
> longer than 63 characters, and found that these records were
> successfully loaded
Jim Yang wrote:
>
> What is the DNS name label length limit? As per RFC 1035, it is 63
> characters. I tested a few DNS names that contains a label that is
> longer than 63 characters, and found that these records were
> successfully loaded in RPZ zone.
On the wire the length limit is 63. In pre
Hi,
What is the DNS name label length limit? As per RFC 1035, it is 63 characters.
I tested a few DNS names that contains a label that is longer than 63
characters, and found that these records were successfully loaded in RPZ zone.
I wonder if this is a BIND RPZ feature or bug (it allows DNS n
Hi Dennis,
> Do you have any adjustments in /etc/system ?
No. And as mentioned before this is a Solaris 11 system, so /etc/system is
(mostly) irrelevant, as the IP settings are all done with ipadm now.
>
> # ndd -get /dev/ip \? | grep "read"
> # ndd -get /dev/tcp \? | grep "read"
>
That, as w
On 06/29/2017 12:52 PM, Marc Richter wrote:
Hi again,
I have checked this again today.
Send & receive buffers are both 1MB, the Server has 8 CPUs and during
startup BIND is reporting this:
found 8 CPUs, using 8 worker threads
using 7 UDP listeners per interface
using up
Hi again,
I have checked this again today.
Send & receive buffers are both 1MB, the Server has 8 CPUs and during
startup BIND is reporting this:
found 8 CPUs, using 8 worker threads
using 7 UDP listeners per interface
using up to 32768 sockets
We only have about 1.500 qu
11 matches
Mail list logo
