Re: How to generate authoritative DNS64 reverse zone

2017-05-19 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <57bf558b-f4eb-f2e4-c27c-9447ff4dd...@axu.tm>, Aleksi Suhonen writes: > Hello, > > Suppose that I have a NAT64 prefix 2001:67c:2b0:db32:0:1::/96 and a > couple of DNS64 resolvers that use it. The resolvers will also generate > nice CNAMEs that point to in-addr.arpa for that prefix. Thi

Re: How to generate authoritative DNS64 reverse zone

2017-05-19 Thread Alberto Colosi
Hi, is hard an ISP give to you a reverse lookup zone first of all , is needed you to "own" all zone (ipv4 , all C class) for example. as second thing, is really hard to move definitions on TLD like ripe , arin, apnic or others is more possible ISP give to you (if first line is true) cont

Re: are you using lwres?

2017-05-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.05.2017 um 14:26 schrieb G.W. Haywood: On Fri, 19 May 2017, Evan Hunt wrote: Do you run lwresd or named-with-lwres? Do you have code that links with liblwres? If so, please let me know. 8<-- mail6:~# >>> cat /etc/de

How to generate authoritative DNS64 reverse zone

2017-05-19 Thread Aleksi Suhonen
Hello, Suppose that I have a NAT64 prefix 2001:67c:2b0:db32:0:1::/96 and a couple of DNS64 resolvers that use it. The resolvers will also generate nice CNAMEs that point to in-addr.arpa for that prefix. This is nice. But other resolvers in the world won't do that, so I'd need to have a real rever

Re: inline-signing a zone that exists in two views

2017-05-19 Thread Bob Harold
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> > Is it considered best-practice (or just normal) for authoritative >>> > servers to just not use the local server for resolution? >>> >> > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Tony Finch wrote: >> >>> Mine d

Re: are you using lwres?

2017-05-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 18.05.17 21:13, Evan Hunt wrote: At ISC we've recently been discussing the idea of deprecating the lightweight resolver interface as of BIND 9.12. This means removing lwresd and liblwres, and deprecating the lwres statement in named.conf. (Note that they would remain available in earlier rele

Re: inline-signing a zone that exists in two views

2017-05-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Gordon Messmer wrote: > Is it considered best-practice (or just normal) for authoritative > servers to just not use the local server for resolution? On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Tony Finch wrote: Mine don't :-) On 18.05.17 16:38, Bob Harold wrote: My authoritative servers are non-recu

Re: are you using lwres?

2017-05-19 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Fri, 19 May 2017, Evan Hunt wrote: Do you run lwresd or named-with-lwres? Do you have code that links with liblwres? If so, please let me know. 8<-- mail6:~# >>> cat /etc/debian_version 8.7 mail6:~# >>> apt-get