Hello,
In Socket.c, there are many "manager->nevents"
for an example, manager->nevents = ISC_SOCKET_MAXEVENTS;
but the manager is defined in "isc_socketmgr_t *manager "
typedef struct isc_socketmgr isc_socketmgr_t; /*%< Socket Manager */
struct isc_socketmgr {
/* Not locked. */
unsigned
Thanks everybody.
See you!
--
Miguel Moreira
Gerente
DPR/SRE/GSR - Gerência de Serviços de Rede
+55(31)3339-1401
PRODEMGE - Companhia de Tecnologia da Informação do Estado de Minas Gerais
Aviso:
Esta mensagem é destinada exclusivamente para a(s) pessoa(s) a quem é
dirigida, podendo conte
> I'd like to know if it's possible to use NTA (Negative Trust Anchor) in a
> way I can set it's lifetime as unlimited for a specific domain. I have a
> situation that will be necessary to keep this kind of configuration at
> least for 3 months.
It is not currently possible to configure that in B
Hi Miguel
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 01:17:00PM -0200, Miguel Mucio Santos Moreira wrote:
> Hi folks
>
>
> I'd like to know if it's possible to use NTA (Negative Trust Anchor) in a way
> I can set it's lifetime as unlimited for a specific domain.
> I have a situation that will be necessary to keep
Hi folks
I'd like to know if it's possible to use NTA (Negative Trust Anchor) in a way I
can set it's lifetime as unlimited for a specific domain.
I have a situation that will be necessary to keep this kind of configuration at
least for 3 months.
Thanks in advance
Cheers!
--
Miguel Moreir
On 14.02.17 13:24 MURTARI, JOHN wrote:
> Johannes,
> Noted your message below. I might suggest you check out the 'views'
> feature of BIND. You may find it a lot easier to setup/manage. Some
> starting info:
> https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00851/0/Understanding-views-in-BIND-9-by-examp
Johannes,
Noted your message below. I might suggest you check out the 'views'
feature of BIND. You may find it a lot easier to setup/manage. Some starting
info:
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00851/0/Understanding-views-in-BIND-9-by-example.html
Best regards!
John
Hi Tony,
On 14.02.17 13:16 Tony Finch wrote:
> It's annoying but benign.
[nice explanation snipped]
Thanks for the confirmation, so it's nothing to worry about.
> For a "forward" zone, BIND acts as a recursive client, and expects
> the target server to be a recursive server. This mostly becom
Johannes Kastl wrote:
>
> client 192.168.99.2#22059 (ojkastl.de): query (cache) 'ojkastl.de/DS/IN'
> denied
>
> Is this actually something to worry about?
It's annoying but benign. The recursive server is sending DS queries to
the wrong server, to the child zone's server (from the static-stub
co
Hi all,
I am trying to get more familiar with named/bind, and thus I am
experimenting a little. I am seeking for guidance in setting up a
split-dns server (aka resolving internal hosts that the outside does
not see and know about).
Host_1
I have bind running as caching resolver in my home dmz, on
10 matches
Mail list logo