Helo,
Time to time we are having problem in resolving some domains, one of them is
"abudawood.com" we unable to resolve through our DNS servers of
"ns10.cyberia.net.sa" where I have latest bind version and all, what could
be the issue and what is the best way to trouble shoot.
My bin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source
rpms, and build instructions.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREKAAYFAlibpa8ACgkQL6j7milTFsFi5gCfSEhAyxLOEgFDY8aoSkuLnXvD
dywAn3RVuHRJE9n5Oh0
Bob,
Thank you, the assurance that I'd understood the defaults and that nsupdate was
the correct tool was all that was missing.
I executed the update commands and they worked like a charm.
Thank you,
Brian
===
The forward table looks like this
hr16038 A 1
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Cuttler, Brian R (HEALTH) <
brian.cutt...@health.ny.gov> wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> I understand. Let me refocus the question.
>
> DHCP:
> I know DHCP will remove the info when the old lease expires, will it
> remove this information for me in the case of the device fallin
I copied and pasted the solution from Outlook email, but I don't see it, so
I guess I'll type it.
Again, DONE, and I share the solution below from our DNS Admin for the
knowledge library; thanks again.
PTR records for the specified server below were missing.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Rein
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
> frankly - one last time, otherwise don't expect any future answers - if
> you get a response on the mailing list then sned your answer to the mailing
> list and *not* to the individual which responded
>
> Am 08.02.2017 um 17:46 schrieb Majid
Kevin,
I understand. Let me refocus the question.
DHCP:
I know DHCP will remove the info when the old lease expires, will it remove
this information for me in the case of the device falling off line, and how can
I accelerate that process so that I can reassign the printer tag to a new IP
addre
Honestly, this is like asking for a closet that automatically throws out the
items you pitch into it, once the items are deemed obsolete or junk.
The DNS database is a repository of information, like a closet, but it has no
inherent way of knowing the value or currency of the information that is
Hello Bind and DHCP users,
Sorry for the post to both lists, but it is a dynamic DNS question and I'm not
sure where the answer will come from.
We replaced the network card in a printer, which had been working, we had a
DHCP lease, we had created from DHCP a dynamic DNS forward and reverse reco
frankly - one last time, otherwise don't expect any future answers - if
you get a response on the mailing list then sned your answer to the
mailing list and *not* to the individual which responded
Am 08.02.2017 um 17:46 schrieb Majid Chavoshi:
I understand, I am the Unix/Linux SysAdmin down st
don't reply off-list on mailing-lists!
Am 08.02.2017 um 17:37 schrieb Majid Chavoshi:
Hey reindl,
Thanks so much for your reply. How would I find out if I own it or not?
Sorry, but I'm kind of new at this; thanks.
if you would have told the nameserver and sample ip's everybody already
could
Ladys & Gents,
My DNS was working find, but the reverse look up suddenly stopped working
for most servers (it still works for a few servers, I'd say it still works
for 20% of servers). Where can I look? What to restart? What should I do?
Thanks.
--
**
*Thank you & have a very nice day,*
*Majid
Am 08.02.2017 um 17:26 schrieb Majid Chavoshi:
My DNS was working find, but the reverse look up suddenly stopped
working for most servers (it still works for a few servers, I'd say it
still works for 20% of servers). Where can I look? What to restart? What
should I do? Thanks
you don't provid
+1 to Alan. While I work at an ivory tower and support Mark's mission, in
practice I don't have operational time (nor is it necessarily the best use of
my time) to maintain a per-ip bypass.
100% in support of enabling this by default as long as their as an option to
disable.
-Michael
> -
> On Feb 7, 2017, at 11:07 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>
> No, we have a field that has more information in it. Same field E ->
> E(version)
>
> 08-Feb-2017 15:15:44.532 client @0x7fc1c803c600 127.0.0.1#57982/key external
> (rock.dv.isc.org): view external: query: rock.dv.isc.org IN A -SE(0)D
15 matches
Mail list logo
