Am 26.01.2017 um 19:50 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
On 01/26/2017 06:39 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
On 1/26/17 1:31 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
The POSIX and XPG4 approach [is a great idea]
(My text in brackets)
Said no one, ever.
That wasn't the point however. The point is that the sources do
exist fo
Am 26.01.2017 um 19:55 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
On 01/26/2017 06:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
libraries got overwritten by the package manager
Impossible.
If the user built or the vendor supplied software follows the rules
of separation along with the RPATH and RUNPATH data inside the ELF
On 1/26/17 1:50 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 01/26/2017 06:39 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
>> On 1/26/17 1:31 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>> The POSIX and XPG4 approach [is a great idea]
>>
>> (My text in brackets)
>>
>> Said no one, ever.
>
>Clearly I just said it ... and have before ... as have othe
On 01/26/2017 06:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
librarie sgot overwritten by the package manager
Impossible.
If the user built or the vendor supplied software follows the rules
of separation along with the RPATH and RUNPATH data inside the ELF
dynamic sections then what you say is impossi
On 01/26/2017 06:39 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
On 1/26/17 1:31 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
The POSIX and XPG4 approach [is a great idea]
(My text in brackets)
Said no one, ever.
Clearly I just said it ... and have before ... as have others for
about twenty years or at least since 1999. Essential
Am 26.01.2017 um 19:31 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
1) OpenSSL dependency dance
I removed OpenSSL 1.1 and compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2e from source
You'll probably have better luck installing Debian's libssl1.0-dev and
related packages, rather than installing it yourself. Plain libssl-dev in
Stretch is
On 1/26/17 1:31 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> The POSIX and XPG4 approach [is a great idea]
(My text in brackets)
Said no one, ever.
AlanC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind
1) OpenSSL dependency dance
I removed OpenSSL 1.1 and compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2e from source
You'll probably have better luck installing Debian's libssl1.0-dev and
related packages, rather than installing it yourself. Plain libssl-dev in
Stretch is OpenSSL 1.1.
If you install stuff yourself f
Am 26.01.2017 um 18:59 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
OpenSSL 1.1 is currently not supported because they made
backwards-incompatible API changes ...
Is this issue documented somewhere?
it was discussed multiple times here
https://www.google.com/search?q=bind+openssl+1.1
when you follow several d
OpenSSL 1.1 is currently not supported because they made
> backwards-incompatible API changes ...
Is this issue documented somewhere ?
Dennis Clarke
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this li
Am 26.01.2017 um 16:30 schrieb Wolfgang Riedel:
I agree and also didn’t like it but I had been told that OpenSSL 1.1 is currently
not supported because they made backwards-incompatible API changes and this is the
default on Debian stretch. That’s the reason why I compiled from source to get t
Hi Tony,
I agree and also didn’t like it but I had been told that OpenSSL 1.1 is
currently not supported because they made backwards-incompatible API changes
and this is the default on Debian stretch. That’s the reason why I compiled
from source to get to 1.0 < 1.1
Wolfgang
> On 26 Jan 2017,
Wolfgang Riedel wrote:
>
> Just wonder if someone had success compiling bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0
> (stretch)?
I haven't tried it myself.
> 1) OpenSSL dependency dance
>
> I removed OpenSSL 1.1 and compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2e from source
You'll probably have better luck installing Debian's libs
Hi Folks,Just wonder if someone had success compiling bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)?1) OpenSSL dependency danceI removed OpenSSL 1.1 and compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2e from sourceopenssl versionOpenSSL 1.0.2e 3 Dec 20152) configure./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/s
WorksForMe info.nominet.uk = 137.117.185.220 both thru my ISP (75.75.75.75)
and through Bind at 07:50 AM EST (USA, GMT - 5:00). Maybe it is fixed on
the domain name server.
Charles Elliott
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Volker J
Jim Garrison via bind-users wrote:
>
> Looking at the traffic with Wireshark, I see the RRSIG uses
> ECDSA Curve P-256 with SHA-256. Should bind 9.8.2 be able to
> recognize that algorithm or is a newer version of bind needed?
The CHANGES file on the 9.8 branch says ECDSA support was added in 9.
Volker Janzen wrote:
>
> when my Bind resolver tries to get the A record for info.nominet.uk the
> syslog gets lots of messages like this:
>
> Jan 25 21:15:52 box named[25097]: DNS format error from 173.245.58.93#53
> resolving info.nominet.uk/DS: invalid response
OK
BIND 9.11 introduces catalog zones to simplify the management of slave
servers. The documentation just mentions support for the "masters" (also
with key), "allow-query" and "allow-transfer" options within the
contents of a catalog zone. Can the "allow-notify" option be used, too,
as an APL RR or do
18 matches
Mail list logo
