On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:49 PM, project722 wrote:
> Bob, I have few questions regarding your sample config. First off it is
> slightly different than mine, which does work BTW at least in a lab
> environment. In your internal view what is the purpose of having this line:
>
> // this list must n
Bob, I have few questions regarding your sample config. First off it is
slightly different than mine, which does work BTW at least in a lab
environment. In your internal view what is the purpose of having this line:
// this list must not match 127.0.0.1
!key "external"; // use t
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:34 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:48:54AM -0400, Bob Harold wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:37 AM, project722
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Bob, I will look into this. Do you know if the forwarders
> > > feature is supported in Bind 9.8.2?
> > >
> >
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:48:54AM -0400, Bob Harold wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:37 AM, project722 wrote:
>
> > Thanks Bob, I will look into this. Do you know if the forwarders
> > feature is supported in Bind 9.8.2?
> >
> Yes, forwarders is an old and stable feature.
>
> ("in-view" is n
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:37 AM, project722 wrote:
> Thanks Bob, I will look into this. Do you know if the forwarders feature
> is supported in Bind 9.8.2?
>
>
Yes, forwarders is an old and stable feature.
("in-view" is new and experimental)
--
Bob Harold
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Bo
Hello,
we use Bind with DLZ, Postgres 8.4.8 as RDBMS support.
Everything works but, with DLZ query, i notice (in Postsgresql log), that Bind
calls two times the same queries.
For example, to resolve with Bind-DLZ www.fiorino.it, it should make three
queries (to descend until Top level domain):
Thanks Bob, I will look into this. Do you know if the forwarders feature is
supported in Bind 9.8.2?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Bob Harold wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:23 PM, project722 wrote:
>
>> I'm interested in the "view forwarding" method. I'm only setting up views
>> to resol
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:23 PM, project722 wrote:
> I'm interested in the "view forwarding" method. I'm only setting up views
> to resolve a split DNS issue with one domain. I'd like to have that one
> zone/domain in my internal view and then if the source IP requests info for
> any other zone fo
On 06.09.16 16:23, project722 wrote:
I'm interested in the "view forwarding" method. I'm only setting up views
to resolve a split DNS issue with one domain. I'd like to have that one
zone/domain in my internal view and then if the source IP requests info for
any other zone forward that to my exte
On 2016-09-06 08:01, Bob Harold wrote:
I agree with one PTR per IP. But since you have 5 IP's, you can have
one PTR record on each, just be sure there is a matching forward "A"
record. Your list of 5 names looks good, but only if each service uses
the corresponding IP for its outgoing connectio
10 matches
Mail list logo