On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 06:59:35PM +, Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Should minimal-all (v9.11.0-rc1) work on a master? My testing shows that it
> only works on the slave DNS servers.
>
And by minimal-all I mean minimal-any (i keep typo'ing that for some reason
today) :-
Hello,
Should minimal-all (v9.11.0-rc1) work on a master? My testing shows that it
only works on the slave DNS servers.
relevant named.conf: http://paste.debian.net/plainh/62ee2440
-Jim P.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Please vi
>> We maintain a block list with RPZ on our BIND resolvers. I noticed that
>> the RPZ policy action does not apply for domain names which SERVFAIL
>> (i.e. cannot be resolved by the resolver because of a timeout, lame
>> delegation etc.).
>
> RPZ applies to responses not queries.
>
> You can over
On 02/09/16 15:22, Daniel Stirnimann wrote:
Hi all
We maintain a block list with RPZ on our BIND resolvers. I noticed that
the RPZ policy action does not apply for domain names which SERVFAIL
(i.e. cannot be resolved by the resolver because of a timeout, lame
delegation etc.).
RPZ applies to r
Hi all
We maintain a block list with RPZ on our BIND resolvers. I noticed that
the RPZ policy action does not apply for domain names which SERVFAIL
(i.e. cannot be resolved by the resolver because of a timeout, lame
delegation etc.).
This happens on both BIND 9.11.0rc1 and 9.9.9-P2.
Our default
2016-08-31 19:50 GMT+07:00 Tony Finch :
> Aleks Ostapenko wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, after
> >
> > 1. rndc freeze myzone
> > 2. named-comilezone -f raw -F text -o myzone.text myzone myzone.signed
> > change TTL on DNSKEY and RRSIG DNSKEY in myzone.text
> > named-comilezone -f text -F
6 matches
Mail list logo