Hello
We are upgrading our DNS authoritative BIND version 9.10.4-P1 but we are
facing "writing errors" on the slave zone files that are transferred from
other Master DNS servers.
Our configuration consists of two views (local and inter) and the domain is
configured in both views sections.
I support the license change as well, and I’d like to specifically applaud the
use of a license that still allows for commercial use even while nicely asking
for the re-contribution of any improvements.
(speaking for myself and not the University)
-Mathew Eis
__
Hi there,
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Jun Xiang X Tee wrote:
...
I wish to append a hard-coded text tuple into end of the section.
...
I think what you want to do sounds strange, but if I wanted to do
something like that I would not modify an existing perfectly good
utility. I would create a new o
Dear Kevin,
Thank you for your reply! I wish to include some random information about a
domain. I think your suggestion is great. I will look more on how to create an
experimental record type. Do you mind to point me to an existing post about how
to create it? Thanks!
Regards,
Jun Xiang T
"The MPL license requires that anyone redistributing the code who has
changed it must publish their changes ."
Sounds like the MPL has the "(please?) share your changes with the
other users of the software so that all may benefit" (directive?)
Good, the MPL has that in common with the GPL. O
That's not really consistent with the DNS standards, and will break if you have
intermediate caching servers. Why? Because of this clause from RFC 2181:
Unauthenticated RRs received and cached from the least trustworthy of
those groupings, that is data from the additional data section, and
data f
Dear members,
This is my first time posting a question to the mailing list. I am not sure
whether I should post my technical question to this list or not. If it is not,
I apologize for any inconvenience caused.
When I query for "google.com", the additional section returned is:
;; ADD
Hi guys,
We enabled the fetch-per-zone parameter on our DNS, it doing a great job but
when I check the named.stats I also see some spilled requests due to server
quota while I didn't enable.
As I think, if the param is not declared into the named.conf, it should not be
enable, am I right ?
-
On 15/06/2016 12:31, Harshith Mulky wrote:
> How can I enable EDNS on the bind server?
>
>
> Will just enabling this
>
> edns-udp-size size_in_bytes ;
>
> set the EDNS on the bind server?
>
>
> Or is EDNS Client specfic feature?
EDNS is always enabled on a BIND 9.9 server, but it's only perm
How can I enable EDNS on the bind server?
Will just enabling this
edns-udp-size size_in_bytes ;
set the EDNS on the bind server?
Or is EDNS Client specfic feature?
Thanks
Harshith
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On 6/14/2016 11:19 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 15/06/2016 10:29, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On 6/14/2016 4:28 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 15/06/2016 05:38, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
It seems some on the list are short on philosophy? Well here is
the actual philosophy and I'll apologize in advance th
11 matches
Mail list logo
