RE: Forward zone not working

2016-05-21 Thread Woodworth, John R
> -Original Message- > From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org > [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Matus UHLAR - fantomas > Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 1:27 PM > To: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Re: Forward zone not working > > On 20.05.16 21:09, Woodworth, John

RE: Forward zone not working

2016-05-21 Thread Woodworth, John R
> -Original Message- > From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org > [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Matus UHLAR - fantomas > Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 1:16 PM > To: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Re: Forward zone not working > > >2016-05-20 23:09 GMT+02:00 Woodwo

RE: Forward zone not working

2016-05-21 Thread Woodworth, John R
> -Original Message- > From: MegaBrutal [mailto:megabru...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 9:11 PM > To: Woodworth, John R; bind-users > Subject: Re: Forward zone not working > > 2016-05-20 23:09 GMT+02:00 Woodworth, John R : > > The below referenced I-D for "BULK" records: > > *

Re: Forward zone not working

2016-05-21 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 20.05.16 21:09, Woodworth, John R wrote: This is exactly what some colleagues and I are working to get a handle on. We see this as becoming a larger and larger issue especially as IPv6 adoption increases. We have had several customers already request generics at /96 and larger blocks as they

Re: Forward zone not working

2016-05-21 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
2016-05-20 23:09 GMT+02:00 Woodworth, John R : The below referenced I-D for "BULK" records: * Provides "generics" which are automatically generated based on a set of rules. * The records have similar features as wildcards where they may be superimposed an appear only where more specific