RE: Re: dname reverse delegation

> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:40:30 +0100, > > Paul A wrote: > > > > > > I have a few /24 that I want to delegate using DNAME. > > > > > > Are you expecting to save yourself trouble by doing so? > > If not, you should probably reconsider. > > > > If you decide DNAME is a useful trick, bear in mi

Re: dname reverse delegation

> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:40:30 +0100, > Paul A wrote: > > > > I have a few /24 that I want to delegate using DNAME. > > > Are you expecting to save yourself trouble by doing so? > If not, you should probably reconsider. > > If you decide DNAME is a useful trick, bear in mind that what DNAME >