Re: SRV Request to DNS

2015-10-14 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <561e91ed.3060...@clegg.com>, Alan Clegg writes: > > > Are there *any* current, well-known protocols that make use of SRV > > records to find the port? The examples I've seen just use it to find a > > server (analogous to the way MX records are used for mail). > > I guess it depends on

Re: SRV Request to DNS

2015-10-14 Thread Alan Clegg
On 10/14/15 11:29 AM, Barry Margolin wrote: > Are there *any* current, well-known protocols that make use of SRV > records to find the port? The examples I've seen just use it to find a > server (analogous to the way MX records are used for mail). I guess it depends on what you define as a well

Re: SRV Request to DNS

2015-10-14 Thread Bob Harold
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Anders Löwinger wrote: > Den 2015-10-14 kl. 17:29, skrev Barry Margolin: > > Are there **any** current, well-known protocols that make use of SRV > records to find the port? The examples I've seen just use it to find a > server (analogous to the way MX records ar

Re: SRV Request to DNS

2015-10-14 Thread Anders Löwinger
Den 2015-10-14 kl. 17:29, skrev Barry Margolin: Are there*any* current, well-known protocols that make use of SRV records to find the port? The examples I've seen just use it to find a server (analogous to the way MX records are used for mail). Examples: SIP http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view

Re: SRV Request to DNS

2015-10-14 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Mark Andrews wrote: > To answer the question. What you do when given a name and a port > is protocol specific. Read the protocol specification. Note if > the port is the well known port for the protocol then it may be > ignored. > > If the protocol does not specify most develope

RE: dname reverse delegation

2015-10-14 Thread Paul A
Yeah, it looks like I might have to give up on this. paul -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Matus UHLAR - fantomas Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 10:29 AM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: dname reve

Re: dname reverse delegation

2015-10-14 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 14.10.15 10:11, Paul A wrote: Niall my problem is the name server that delegated the reserve does look up the record correctly. I have this in the zone, DNAME 0/24 ;; ;;; delegate to server ;; 0/24NS ns.someserver.com ;; At the ns.someserver.com the looks u

RE: dname reverse delegation

2015-10-14 Thread Paul A
Niall my problem is the name server that delegated the reserve does look up the record correctly. I have this in the zone, DNAME 0/24 ;; ;;; delegate to server ;; 0/24NS ns.someserver.com ;; At the ns.someserver.com the looks ups work with no problems. However