Re: How are DNS Records added dynamically in DNS Servers?

2015-09-08 Thread Ken Peng
OK I will forward this message to their windns list. Thx. On 2015/9/9 星期三 2:53, Robert Edmonds wrote: Mark Andrews wrote: Because outlook.com's nameservers are not EDNS compliant which breaks anyone attempting to use EDNS extensions unless they hack around this. Some of their nameservers are

Re: BIND and RFC4074

2015-09-08 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <55eee8b0.6070...@redhat.com>, Tomas Hozza writes: > Hi. > > I would like to ask if there is any documentation > describing if any version of BIND didn't comply > with RFC 4074. And in case there was such version, > in which release it was fixed? There is no version which had those is

Re: How are DNS Records added dynamically in DNS Servers?

2015-09-08 Thread Dave Warren
On 2015-09-08 11:53, Robert Edmonds wrote: Mark Andrews wrote: Because outlook.com's nameservers are not EDNS compliant which breaks anyone attempting to use EDNS extensions unless they hack around this. Some of their nameservers are not even compliant with RFC 2181 §5.2. ;; QUESTION SECTION:

Re: How are DNS Records added dynamically in DNS Servers?

2015-09-08 Thread Robert Edmonds
Mark Andrews wrote: > Because outlook.com's nameservers are not EDNS compliant which > breaks anyone attempting to use EDNS extensions unless they hack > around this. Some of their nameservers are not even compliant with RFC 2181 §5.2. ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;outlook.com. IN

Re: BIND and RFC4074

2015-09-08 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Tomas Hozza wrote: > Hi. > > I would like to ask if there is any documentation > describing if any version of BIND didn't comply > with RFC 4074. And in case there was such version, > in which release it was fixed? > > I tried to go through CHANGELOG and to Google it, > but withou

BIND and RFC4074

2015-09-08 Thread Tomas Hozza
Hi. I would like to ask if there is any documentation describing if any version of BIND didn't comply with RFC 4074. And in case there was such version, in which release it was fixed? I tried to go through CHANGELOG and to Google it, but without any luck. Thanks. Regards, -- Tomas Hozza Softwa

Re: Secondarying DLZ zones

2015-09-08 Thread Rich Goodson
Robert, Try setting the “Refresh” value in your SOA record to 3600. RFC1912 recommends refresh values between 1200 and 43200. If notify messages are not working, I’d set it to 20 or 30 minutes, myself. if the zone is unchanged, all it costs you is one SOA query by the slave. Just make sure

RE: Install BIND 9.9.7-P2 to fix vulnerability CVE-2015-5477

2015-09-08 Thread stavrostseriotis
Yes you are right probably I will uninstall bind and install the RedHat version. This procedure took an awful lot time and is still in progress. So I guess that this is the best option that I have. Thank you From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] O

Re: Install BIND 9.9.7-P2 to fix vulnerability CVE-2015-5477

2015-09-08 Thread Timothe Litt
On 08-Sep-15 00:46, stavrostseriotis wrote: > > Ok here is what I did: > > · After extracting the package I looked out at directories > */usr/local/bin *and */usr/local/sbin *as mentioned in the procedure > but I found that there are no files there. > > · I run *configure* command

Re: Install BIND 9.9.7-P2 to fix vulnerability CVE-2015-5477

2015-09-08 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 08.09.2015 um 06:46 schrieb stavrostseriotis: Ok here is what I did: ·After extracting the package I looked out at directories */usr/local/bin *and */usr/local/sbin *as mentioned in the procedure but I found that there are no files there. man updatedb man locate ·I run *configure* comma