Am 05.08.2015 um 06:15 schrieb Mark Andrews:
> In message , Heiko Richter writes:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm hoping someone here can help me with a problem in my DNSSec
>> configuration.
>>
>> I'm running Bind 9 in Debian Jessie and just finished configuring it
>> with DNSSec for my zones. Everything includi
On 2015-08-04 07:14, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:36:25PM -0500,
Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
This unfortunately looks like the thread for me to jump on to
I missed installing the last two 9.9...-p# patches, first time I
built everything and was pretty much ready to do
In message , Heiko Richter writes:
> Hi!
>
> I'm hoping someone here can help me with a problem in my DNSSec
> configuration.
>
> I'm running Bind 9 in Debian Jessie and just finished configuring it
> with DNSSec for my zones. Everything including automatic key rollover
> for the ZSKs is working
The short answer is that that is how address-match-lists work: a non-negated
match allows access, a negated match denies access, and if there is *no* match,
access is denied. The only real reason to use a negated match, therefore, is
when what you're negating is a subset of something later in th
Folks,
This has been a real mystery and haven't been able to find a good
explanation for the behavior. For a simple example I have two views setup and I
want to differentiate access based on queries originating from 127.0.0.1.
In my FIRST ATTEMPT I just negated the IP address, b
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 04:01:56PM -0300, Leandro wrote:
> Hello , guys , im thinking about getting my bind statistics
> on cacti. Im looking for some parser script but so far I can
> not get anyone for my version, witch is 9.8.
I guess by "named_stats", you mean the file which is written for
"rn
Hello , guys , im thinking about getting my bind statistics on cacti.
Im looking for some parser script but so far I can not get anyone for my
version, witch is 9.8.
Is something around there ?
If not I will need to deploy by my self ... then of course will
share it.
Regards.
Leand
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 07:14:38AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> It would require some reworking of things, but you might be
> interested in the new BIND 9.10 feature of "in-view" zone option.
> This lets you literally include a zone from another view. See
> BIND 9 ARM chapter 6, "zone Statement Def
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:36:25PM -0500,
Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
> This unfortunately looks like the thread for me to jump on to
>
> I missed installing the last two 9.9...-p# patches, first time I
> built everything and was pretty much ready to do it, and then
> forgot all about
9 matches
Mail list logo