On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 09.04.15 13:25, Frank Even wrote:
>>
>> Is there any place I can look to get a definitive answer in what cases
>> "flushname" will and will not work?
>
>
> it will work if you have old entries in the cache.
> that will NOT help you
On 09.04.15 13:25, Frank Even wrote:
Is there any place I can look to get a definitive answer in what cases
"flushname" will and will not work?
it will work if you have old entries in the cache.
that will NOT help you if any of the servers that are supposed to be
authoritative for a domain will
On 09/04/15 16:50, Hillary Nelson wrote:
Hi Hillary,
> Currently we have about 20 DNS servers sit behind two pairs of F5 LTM on
> campus, the two pairs of F5s using router injection for DNS virtual
> addresses. This setup is costly and we are trying to use direct anycast
> between router and serv
Is there any place I can look to get a definitive answer in what cases
"flushname" will and will not work? I've been digging around in lists
and docs and can't seem to find any definitive answers. I've been
having odd troubles clearing a name from a cache and after even
clearing the name and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> Or you can allow your slave files to remain in binary format (it
> gives you a roughly factor-4 speedup in loading the files, which
> can be significant with large zones). When you want to look at the
> text version, convert them:
>
> $ named-ch
We're considering doing something similar, but have nothing in the way
of scripts to offer.
I'm curious what you mean by 'router injection for DNS virtual
addresses'. Off topic for this list, sorry, but are you meaning that
you're currently using dynamic routing (BGP/OSPF/RIP) in the F5 TMM?
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 4/9/15 2:58 AM, Catalin Leanca wrote:
> "If the label contains a pin-source field, tools using the
> generated key files will be able to use the HSM for signing and
> other operations without any need for an operator to manually enter
> a PIN."
W
Currently we have about 20 DNS servers sit behind two pairs of F5 LTM on
campus, the two pairs of F5s using router injection for DNS virtual
addresses. This setup is costly and we are trying to use direct anycast
between router and server instead, with quagga and bgp.
The decision of advertise/wit
On 08/04/15 22:00, Chuck Anderson wrote:
No, you are right. My filtered view of the packet capture was missing
the fact that another unrelated client did an 'ANY' query. I found it
in the query log. BIND 9.10 implements prefresh, but I'm on 9.8.2.
Oops just saw this, disregard my other ema
On 08/04/15 20:25, Chuck Anderson wrote:
My questions are, what is at fault here? Is it a BIND bug to expect
It all sounds really odd. In particular, if there is no recursive client
triggering them, and no prefetch, where are these ANY/A queries on TTL
expiry coming from?
Are you certain
10 matches
Mail list logo
