So the question seems to come down to: "why does Google's name server not
return the when I query it from some IPs?"
==
dig +norecurse ghs.l.google.com @ns1.google.com
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> +norecurse ghs.l.google.com @ns1.google.com
;; global options:
In message <001e01d01f0e$980b6070$c8222150$@iname.com>, "Frank Bulk" writes:
> Thanks, Mark.
>
> When I queried for the of ghs.l.google.com from ns[1-4].google.com the
> Google servers reported they don't do recursive queries.
Why would you expect them to offer recursion? They don't need t
Hi Len
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 03:02:49PM -0600, lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
> sent data to a ISC.org guy, no response.
Is this about the config file that you sent me? I had asked you to send
me dumps over time of the named statistics that are available via HTTP,
as the named process grows. See
Thanks, Mark.
When I queried for the of ghs.l.google.com from ns[1-4].google.com the
Google servers reported they don't do recursive queries. Which Google
namserver does in fact carry the authoritative records for ghs.l.google.com?
On a side note, I thought that Google's DNS servers were du
In message <001301d01f06$aa1c7180$fe555480$@iname.com>, "Frank Bulk" writes:
> I dumped the database of one failing server and found this entry:
>
> ; authauthority
> ghs.l.google.com. 331 \- ;-$NXRRSET
> ; l.google.com. SOA ns4.google.com. dns-admin.google.com. 1577084 900 900
> 1
I dumped the database of one failing server and found this entry:
; authauthority
ghs.l.google.com. 331 \- ;-$NXRRSET
; l.google.com. SOA ns4.google.com. dns-admin.google.com. 1577084 900 900
1800 60
; authanswer
289 A 74.125.201.121
;
What does th
happened with freebsd 10.0 and named 9.10
happening with freebsd 10.1 and named 9.10.1
2014-12-21 18:10:00 VSZ: 3040188 RSS: 2005904
2014-12-21 18:15:00 VSZ: 332732 RSS: 301888 service named
restart
2014-12-21 18:20:00 VSZ: 340924 RSS: 315592
2014-12-21 18:25:00 VSZ: 357308 RS
I would suspect that the instance of the google servers you are talking
to has a bad copy of l.google.com. The serial in the soa records is
1577052. I currently see 1577063.
There is also a possibilty that you are getting spoofed answers by as
the zone is not signed there is no way to know.
Ma
>From time to time there are certain domains that don't properly resolve on
our corporate Windows DNS servers, but flushing the Windows DNS server cache
resolves that. But yesterday I ran into an issue with resolving the
for www.revk.uk on just some our ISP DNS servers and I have time to dig
9 matches
Mail list logo
