RE: BIND NXDOMAIN {REP=5.1}

2014-09-24 Thread Neil
That solution worked Mark , Thank you. One more question, is it possible perform the below, from the left to right The below does not work on NXDOMAIN override. autodiscover.*. IN A 192.168.0.1 autodiscover.nxdomain.com.au should return 192.168.0.1 autodiscover.domainnoexist.net.au sh

RHEL, Centos, Fedora rpm 9.10.1

2014-09-24 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind contains links to the source rpms, and build instructions. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlQjTnoACgkQL6j7milTFsFKCQCeKNbfQdF/hQ6YzLqlO388TSey VdYAn2FKNZpBRnX9/dmjr

9.10.1 arm, response policy

2014-09-24 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The ARM says: [ response-policy { zone zone_name ; [ policy given | disabled | passthru | drop | nxdomain | nodata | cname domain ; ] [ recursive-only yes_or_no ; ] [ max-policy-ttl number ; ] ; [ recursive-only

differing TTLs in RRSet, same label/class/type

2014-09-24 Thread Chuck Anderson
RFC 2181 section 5.2 says that differing TTLs in RRSet with the same label/class/type should be deprecated with the behavior that an authoritative server should reply with all the TTLs set to the lowest TTL in the RRSet: "Should an authoritative source send such a malformed RRSet, the client shoul

Re: Size of libdns between 9.10.0 and 9.10.1

2014-09-24 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 24/09/2014 17:56, Evan Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:23:51AM +0200, Anand Buddhdev wrote: >> I've just downloaded and build BIND 9.10.1, and I noticed something. The >> size of the generated libdns.so.146.0.2 file is 2046056 bytes. In my >> previous build of 9.10.0-P2, the size of li

Re: Size of libdns between 9.10.0 and 9.10.1

2014-09-24 Thread grantksupport
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014, at 08:56 AM, Evan Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:23:51AM +0200, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > > I've just downloaded and build BIND 9.10.1, and I noticed something. The > > size of the generated libdns.so.146.0.2 file is 2046056 bytes. In my > > previous build of 9.10.0-P2

Re: Size of libdns between 9.10.0 and 9.10.1

2014-09-24 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:23:51AM +0200, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > I've just downloaded and build BIND 9.10.1, and I noticed something. The > size of the generated libdns.so.146.0.2 file is 2046056 bytes. In my > previous build of 9.10.0-P2, the size of libdns.so.142.2.2 is 6658892. > That's a massi

Re: something about rrl

2014-09-24 Thread Cathy Almond
On 22/09/2014 11:55, 陈超 wrote: > Dear developers, > > I've recently encountered a problem with the response rate limit of > bind-9.9.5. > > That is,after I configured RRL and started named,I noticed for those > queries,BIND9 would do recursion first,and check the rate limit to decide > whether

Size of libdns between 9.10.0 and 9.10.1

2014-09-24 Thread Anand Buddhdev
Hi BIND developers, I've just downloaded and build BIND 9.10.1, and I noticed something. The size of the generated libdns.so.146.0.2 file is 2046056 bytes. In my previous build of 9.10.0-P2, the size of libdns.so.142.2.2 is 6658892. That's a massive reduction in size. Did you guys suddenly delete