On 06/07/2014 12:36 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> Over time, as it runs, named tries to self-tune the clients-per-query
> value.
>
> If you set clients-per-query to 10 and max-clients-per-query to 100
> (i.e., the default values), that means that the initial limit will be
> 10, but if we ever actually hi
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 12:02:24PM -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> For me, this "clients-per-query" of 10 is an upper limit (maximum number
> of clients before it starts dropping). So then, what's the purpose of
> "max-clients-per-query"?
Over time, as it runs, named tries to self-tune the clients
Hi,
I'm trying to understand the difference between clients-per-query &
max-clients-per-query. I found a nice explanation by Mark Andrews here
[1] but then I wondered about max-clients-per-query.
Given a "clients-per-query" of 10, I assume that named will only queue
up 10 clients before it start
Indeed, its fixed, thanks.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Gardner Bell wrote:
> It looks as though a fix for this was committed to the ports tree about 13
> hours ago. Update your ports and try again.
>
>
> On 7 June 2014 08:35, Rick Dicaire wrote:
>
>> Noel, no I am not.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Ju
It looks as though a fix for this was committed to the ports tree about 13
hours ago. Update your ports and try again.
On 7 June 2014 08:35, Rick Dicaire wrote:
> Noel, no I am not.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Noel Butler
> wrote:
>
>> Not a BSD user, but are you running any sort
Noel, no I am not.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> Not a BSD user, but are you running any sort of extra security
> enforcement toolsets?
> PIE is IIRC, Position Independent Executable.
>
>
> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 19:27 -0400, Rick Dicaire wrote:
>
> Hi folks, in trying t
6 matches
Mail list logo
