On 04/11/2014 10:59 AM, John Wobus wrote:
My understanding has been that two views that are masters for
a zone can safely share a zone file if the zone isn't dynamic (e.g.
dnsupdate, dnssec auto signing, etc), but that two views of
a slave zone shouldn't do that: you could have two
different vie
On 11 Apr 2014, at 18:59, John Wobus wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Steven Carr wrote:
>> However, assuming you are using views on the same IP address and not
>> splitting it across internal/external servers as that would screw up
>> NS records), you can reuse the same zone file so those z
On Apr 9, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Steven Carr wrote:
However, assuming you are using views on the same IP address and not
splitting it across internal/external servers as that would screw up
NS records), you can reuse the same zone file so those zones that
appear in both internal and external views ref
Hello -
Is it possible to enable inline signing of a zone in 2 different views with 2
different keys?
I have the following config:
view "external" {
match-clients {
1.1.1.1;
};
zone "test.com." {
type master;
file "external.test.com.";
allow-update {
On Apr 11 2014, Frederic Woodbridge wrote:
Apologies if this has been discussed; I searched the archives and didn't find
anything.
I'd like to know why the "search" and "domain" settings in the Windows
%systemroot%\system32\drivers\etc\resolv.conf don't seem to make a difference.
Anyone know?
Apologies if this has been discussed; I searched the archives and didn't find
anything.
I'd like to know why the "search" and "domain" settings in the Windows
%systemroot%\system32\drivers\etc\resolv.conf don't seem to make a difference.
Anyone know?
Thanks.
Fred Woodbridge
___
Earlier this week, the OpenSSL project (http://openssl.org) announced
CVE-2014-0160, disclosing a very serious security flaw in the OpenSSL
library, affecting versions 1.0.1 and 1.0.2-beta (including OpenSSL
1.0.1f and 1.0.2-beta1) In many stories, this vulnerability is being
referred to as the "H
7 matches
Mail list logo
