Re: changing NSEC3 salt

2014-02-10 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <52f94ee2.7080...@ksu.edu>, "Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng." writes: > > > On 02/06/14 15:07, Timothe Litt wrote: > > On 06-Feb-14 09:14, Klaus Darilion wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 06.02.2014 14:58, Cathy Almond wrote: > >>> On 06/02/2014 12:58, Timothe Litt wrote: > On 06-Feb-14 05:56, C

Re: changing NSEC3 salt

2014-02-10 Thread Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
On 02/06/14 15:07, Timothe Litt wrote: > On 06-Feb-14 09:14, Klaus Darilion wrote: >> >> >> On 06.02.2014 14:58, Cathy Almond wrote: >>> On 06/02/2014 12:58, Timothe Litt wrote: On 06-Feb-14 05:56, Cathy Almond wrote: > On 05/02/2014 18:54, David Newman wrote: >> The Michael W. Lucas

Re: SERVFAIL @google

2014-02-10 Thread Sten Carlsen
Did you check the serial? and double check. I mean the serial of your uploaded new data. I have once missed that to the effect that no updates happened. On February 10, 2014 12:29:41 PM CET, Lucio Crusca wrote: >In data lunedì 10 febbraio 2014 11:25:59, Steven Carr ha scritto: >> On 10 February

Re: SERVFAIL @google

2014-02-10 Thread Lucio Crusca
In data lunedì 10 febbraio 2014 11:25:59, Steven Carr ha scritto: > On 10 February 2014 11:20, Lucio Crusca wrote: > > Ok, so what should I do now? I want the NS records to point to > > ns0|1.virtual-bit.com. Should I change anything in my zone file or should > > I > > open a new ticket at my doma

Re: SERVFAIL @google

2014-02-10 Thread Steven Carr
On 10 February 2014 11:20, Lucio Crusca wrote: > Ok, so what should I do now? I want the NS records to point to > ns0|1.virtual-bit.com. Should I change anything in my zone file or should I > open a new ticket at my domain provider? Contact the domain provider and ask them to either update the re

Re: SERVFAIL @google

2014-02-10 Thread Lucio Crusca
In data lunedì 10 febbraio 2014 11:16:11, Steven Carr ha scritto: > On 10 February 2014 11:10, Lucio Crusca wrote: > > How did you find that NS servers are ns1.customer.seflow.it and > > ns2.customer.seflow.it? They should be ns0.virtual-bit.com and > > > ns1.virtual-bit.com (see zone file) and h

Re: SERVFAIL @google

2014-02-10 Thread Steven Carr
On 10 February 2014 11:10, Lucio Crusca wrote: > How did you find that NS servers are ns1.customer.seflow.it and > ns2.customer.seflow.it? They should be ns0.virtual-bit.com and > ns1.virtual-bit.com (see zone file) and here dig says exactly that: Trace it from the root, your glue records aren't

Re: SERVFAIL @google

2014-02-10 Thread Lucio Crusca
In data lunedì 10 febbraio 2014 09:41:26, Steven Carr ha scritto: > On 10 February 2014 09:01, Lucio Crusca wrote: > > Sorry, I thought I might be making some obvious mistake so that you > > wouldn't need the actual zone to spot it. > > > > ; > > ; BIND data file for softwareliberopinerolo.org >

Re: SERVFAIL @google

2014-02-10 Thread Steven Carr
On 10 February 2014 09:01, Lucio Crusca wrote: > Sorry, I thought I might be making some obvious mistake so that you wouldn't > need the actual zone to spot it. > > ; > ; BIND data file for softwareliberopinerolo.org > ; That zone file must be out of date. The record being returned now is an A re

Re: SERVFAIL @google

2014-02-10 Thread Lucio Crusca
In data lunedì 10 febbraio 2014 07:51:52, Mark Andrews ha scritto: > Post the zone name and the actual content unaltered if you > want help. > > Stop wasting everyones time by hiding this information. Sorry, I thought I might be making some obvious mistake so that you wouldn't