Hey Warren,
Did you delete your subdomain? coz I dont see that is being resolved.
However mine isnlab.in is set up with godaddy and have added
ns2.dnsmadeeasy.com as NS record for delegated subdomain mysubdom.isnlab.in
> set type=ns
> isnlab.in
Server: google-public-dns-a.google.com
Address: 8.
Yeah Warren you are correct. That seems to be a hack for adding subdomain.
So to answer your queries what I wanted to achieve is mail.example.com will
be my subdomain [again its just not gonna be my host entry] it will be a
delegated sub-domain for which I'll build internal DNS server for
Loadbalan
New development versions of BIND are now available from
http://www.isc.org/downloads
Versions 9.9.5rc1, 9.8.7rc1, and 9.6-ESV-R11rc1 include
changes based on feedback we received from users during
the beta period, but we still welcome testing and feedback
from our users and encourage anyone intere
>I mean I have example.com hosted with Go Daddy while I need sub-domain
>ftp.example.com to be delegated to my internal BIND server.
>
>Does any one know how do I do it in Go Daddy?
The easiest approach in the long run is to move the DNS for the whole
domain to your own DNS servers. Large cheap h
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Blason R wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am not sure if this is an appropriate forum to answer since more or less
> it is pertaining to Go Daddy support but since its a huge community our
> there and I am sure many of them are already using Go Daddy wondering if
> su-dom
In article ,
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> On 2014-01-14 12:39, Blason R wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I am not sure if this is an appropriate forum to answer since more or
> > less it is pertaining to Go Daddy support but since its a huge
> > community our there and I am sure many of them are already
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 07:55:44PM -0500, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> If the domain owner *really* feels that they have to publish *some*
> address record for a particular name, but there is no available
> service at that name, then the null or "unspecified" address (IPv4 =
> 0.0.0.0, IPv6 = ::0) is the a
BIND 9.9.3-P2 is vulnerable to CVE 2014-0591 ("A Crafted Query
Against an NSEC3-signed Zone Can Crash BIND") and CVE 2013-6320 ("A
Winsock API Bug can cause a side-effect affecting BIND ACLs")
While it doesn't look (after a very quick glance) like CVE 2014-0591 (
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-010
Hello
I have very serious trouble about BIND.
And we are in a hurry, so please help us.
Enveroment:
"BIND 9.9.3-P2 (Extended Support Version)".
Here is situation:
Named process suddenly down at 23 Dec 19:58, and the core was outputted.
In addition to this, same kind of problem had occurred in
9 matches
Mail list logo
