In article ,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 21.12.13 14:00, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> >I have pasted the output from running named as above here:
> >http://pastebin.com/FprFEkyb
> >
> >I had changed the zone on the master and reloaded named a couple of
> >times on the slave.
> >
> >Interesting
On 21/12/13 14:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 21.12.13 14:00, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>> I have pasted the output from running named as above here:
>> http://pastebin.com/FprFEkyb
>>
>> I had changed the zone on the master and reloaded named a couple of
>> times on the slave.
>>
>> Interestin
On 21.12.13 14:00, Daniel Lintott wrote:
I have pasted the output from running named as above here:
http://pastebin.com/FprFEkyb
I had changed the zone on the master and reloaded named a couple of
times on the slave.
Interestingly even when I've stopped named and I attempt a transfer it
replies
On 21/12/13 01:15, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> I think this has got to the point of running named in the
> foreground with debugging on the master.
>
> named -g -d 100
>
> This will log everything to stderr.
>
I have pasted the output from running named as above here:
http://pastebin.com/Fp
4 matches
Mail list logo