In message <661ca5ab225cad04bdcc3831c6964...@tux.org>, Joseph S D Yao writes:
> On 2013-11-13 16:44, Mark Andrews wrote:
> ...
> > RFC 1123 (October 1989) applies to all applications on all hosts.
> > Note "SHOULD" and "until".
> ...
>
>
> Mark, I've always read "SHOULD" here as more of a plaint
On 2013-11-13 16:44, Mark Andrews wrote:
...
RFC 1123 (October 1989) applies to all applications on all hosts.
Note "SHOULD" and "until".
...
Mark, I've always read "SHOULD" here as more of a plaintive hope than
anything else. People have certainly felt free to ignore it. Yes, that
makes t
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 09:14:24AM -0500, Alan Clegg wrote:
>
> On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:13 AM, Crist Clark wrote:
>
> > From the initial mail: "This is BIND 9.9.2 (Infoblox 6.7.3)."
> >
> > No huge increase in resource usage noted.
>
> Has the vendor in question provided a response?
>
> Having
Sherif Magdy wrote:
> Can any one help with a template for graphing BIND9.8 queries stats using
> Cacti?
> Or any other way to graph the queries stats and response time and so on
Hello. Sorry for replying so late. I'd suggest looking at
http://www.l3jane.net/wiki/factory:b9agent_en to expose c
In message , Barry Mar
golin writes:
> In article ,
> Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > No, there is no such requirement. The browsers are just BROKEN if
> > they don't try all the offered addresses. All browsers we were
> > written after RFC 1123 was published.
>
> That attitude should probably be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 16:49 -0500, Barry Margolin wrote:
> It means that users will have to wait for an arbitrary
> number of timeouts before the browser can give them an error message.
Well, the browser *could* of course give a message like "I have t
In article ,
Mark Andrews wrote:
> No, there is no such requirement. The browsers are just BROKEN if
> they don't try all the offered addresses. All browsers we were
> written after RFC 1123 was published.
That attitude should probably be moderated when interactive applications
are involved.
In message , Joseph S D Yao writes:
> On 2013-11-13 00:16, Manish Rane wrote:
> ...
> > 6.Assume if ISP1 goes down, client coming on ISP1 would never be able
> > to reach; hence as per DNS protocol will try for another link and
> > come
> > on ISP2 and then probably get an IP address of Link 2 i.
-Original Message-
From: Birta Levente
Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:29 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: logging query time
>Hi
>
>I have a caching nameserver (bind 9.8.2) and I curious if I can log the
>duration of queries to the forwarders?
not that i know of easily (
Hi
I have a caching nameserver (bind 9.8.2) and I curious if I can log the
duration of queries to the forwarders?
Thanks
Levi
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On 2013-11-13 00:16, Manish Rane wrote:
...
6.Assume if ISP1 goes down, client coming on ISP1 would never be able
to reach; hence as per DNS protocol will try for another link and
come
on ISP2 and then probably get an IP address of Link 2 i.e. 2.2.2.2.
...
I'm not sure about your DNS setup,
On 2013-11-11 12:11, S. Jeff Cold wrote:
...
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 22495
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;jeffdiss.org. IN A
...
BIND's configuration file is :
$TTL 3600
$ORIGIN jeffdiss.org.
; St
12 matches
Mail list logo
