Re: intermittent resolution

2013-10-30 Thread Mark Andrews
IF YOU WANT HELP SPECIFY THE FAILING DOMAIN NAME. YES I AM SHOUTING This report is like saying you have a problem with a car manufacture by GM. Mark In message , Con Wieland writes: > I recently upgraded to version: 9.8.6. I am having trouble resolving a .gov s > ite. When I reload the nam

Re: [External] Re: intermittent resolution

2013-10-30 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , "Samp, Daniel [USA]" wrote: > In the past when I've had issues with certain .gov sites (e.g. noaa.gov, > nih.gov, ssa.gov) it was due to application based filtering (layer 4). For > some reason the responses from these sites are more often than not fragmented > and if you have s

RE: [External] Re: intermittent resolution

2013-10-30 Thread Samp, Daniel [USA]
In the past when I've had issues with certain .gov sites (e.g. noaa.gov, nih.gov, ssa.gov) it was due to application based filtering (layer 4). For some reason the responses from these sites are more often than not fragmented and if you have something doing filtering based on ports it may not b

Re: intermittent resolution

2013-10-30 Thread Con Wieland
The site I am having issues with are a half a dozen sites at noaa.gov. No I have not tried 9.9.4 when I upgraded 9.8.6 was listed as the current stable version so I went with that. con On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Alan Clegg wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Con Wieland wrote: > >>

Re: intermittent resolution

2013-10-30 Thread Alan Clegg
On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Con Wieland wrote: > I recently upgraded to version: 9.8.6. I am having trouble resolving a .gov > site. When I reload the name server it will resolve fine for a while then > after an hour or two I will get a server fail. I can perform a dig +trace and > resolve

intermittent resolution

2013-10-30 Thread Con Wieland
I recently upgraded to version: 9.8.6. I am having trouble resolving a .gov site. When I reload the name server it will resolve fine for a while then after an hour or two I will get a server fail. I can perform a dig +trace and resolve but dig will fail. If I do an rndc reload it will work for s

Re: use bind 9.8 as caching server and authoritative nameserver

2013-10-30 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 28 Oct 2013, at 13:10, bind-ch...@telenet.be wrote: > Recently our government obligated all ISP's to block access to child-porn, > illegal betting sites, illegal file share sites etc... > I have been asked now to implement this on our caching DNS servers (serve a > custom zone to all of our

Re: MAcOS X 10.9 upgrade removes BIND

2013-10-30 Thread Carsten Strotmann
Hi Sean, Sean Channel writes: > > Thanks for the M&M package, this is fantastic! On the critical side, > the package BOM only lists an extinct tarball instead of the actual > files and directories in the package. Just a nit pick, apologies: yes, that is a historical artifact from the time where