RE: Performance Tuning RHEL 5 and Bind

2013-10-21 Thread Lightner, Jeff
Any reason you're using RHEL5 as opposed to RHEL6 if you're building new servers? RHEL5 is very long in the tooth and will go EOL sooner than RHEL6. Since you're using a BIND package not shipped with RHEL5 there's no reason on that account not to move up to RHEL6. -Original Message-

Re: DNS 64 and the new domain ipv4only.arpa

2013-10-21 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:47:38AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote a message of 98 lines which said: > dns64 { > clients { me; }; > break-dnssec yes; > }; OK, it works without the DO bit ("dig +nodnssec", I had +dnssec in my ~/.digrc) or with "break-dnssec ye

Re: DNS 64 and the new domain ipv4only.arpa

2013-10-21 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <20131021123504.ga20...@nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes: > I try to understand DNS64 and there is a problem I don't get. I have > BIND configured with: > > dns64 2001:db8:1:64::/96 { // Network-Specific Prefix > clients { me; }; > }; > > and it works,

Re: Performance Tuning RHEL 5 and Bind

2013-10-21 Thread WBrown
> From: Alan Clegg > Fix your windows clients. You can't fix stupid. Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information, and is intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not

DNS 64 and the new domain ipv4only.arpa

2013-10-21 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
I try to understand DNS64 and there is a problem I don't get. I have BIND configured with: dns64 2001:db8:1:64::/96 { // Network-Specific Prefix clients { me; }; }; and it works, synthesis happens when the domain name has no records: % dig +cd @localhost -p 90