Re: compile error building 9.9.3-P2

2013-09-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <6134bb3286a31d4db61e57114e8ba7c0c6112...@seaembx01.olympus.f5net.com>, Jack Tavares writes: > I am attempting to build 9.9.3-P2 in a chroot-ed 32 bit build environment > and I get an redefinition error. > > Has anyone seen this and have a suggestion for how to fix this? > my confi

compile error building 9.9.3-P2

2013-09-12 Thread Jack Tavares
I am attempting to build 9.9.3-P2 in a chroot-ed 32 bit build environment and I get an redefinition error. Has anyone seen this and have a suggestion for how to fix this? my configure options are ./configure --with-openssl= --enable-fixed-rrset --enable-shared --enable-threads --enable-ipv6 --w

RE: compile error building 9.9.3-P2

2013-09-12 Thread Jack Tavares
Please disregard. -- Jack Tavares "How many more can we sell with this button?" From: bind-users-bounces+j.tavares=f5@lists.isc.org [bind-users-bounces+j.tavares=f5@lists.isc.org] on behalf of Jack Tavares [j.tava...@f5.com] Sent: Thursday, Septem

Re: DNSSEC: support for single keys?

2013-09-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <52316c02.90...@restena.lu>, Gilles Massen writes: > > > On 09/12/2013 12:46 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <523080dd.6010...@restena.lu>, Gilles Massen writes: > > >> I'm seeing weird things (multiple RRSIGs when enabling NSEC3) so I'd > >> like to know if these are likely t

Re: Bind9 - multiple identical CNAME records in single resultset (cid-*.calendar.live.com)

2013-09-12 Thread Mark Andrews
Upgrade. This is fixed in the current maintainence releases. 3452. [bug] Accept duplicate singleton records. [RT #32329] Mark In message <523175fe.1070...@rrzn.uni-hannover.de>, Hostmaster LUH writes: > Hello, > > > we are facing issues using bind9 as resolving nameservers for ou

Bind9 - multiple identical CNAME records in single resultset (cid-*.calendar.live.com)

2013-09-12 Thread Hostmaster LUH
Hello, we are facing issues using bind9 as resolving nameservers for our users. The problem is in resolving domains such as cid-*.calendar.live.com, e.g. cid-20e76408fdfb6414.calendar.live.com Bind discards the result with the following message in syslog: named[1403]: error (FORMERR) resolving '

Re: DNSSEC: support for single keys?

2013-09-12 Thread Gilles Massen
On 09/12/2013 12:46 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: > In message <523080dd.6010...@restena.lu>, Gilles Massen writes: >> I'm seeing weird things (multiple RRSIGs when enabling NSEC3) so I'd >> like to know if these are likely to be bugs or if I'm in unchartered >> territory... > > Fixed in the next mai