Re: Reverse address entries

2013-06-28 Thread Noel Butler
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 13:57 -0400, Novosielski, Ryan wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > The short answer is "some software once cared." Does it still now, I'm > not sure. But we do it. SMTP does, IRC does signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed messag

RE: Reverse address entries

2013-06-28 Thread Ward, Mike S
I want to thank everyone for their input. It sounds like they do need the reverse address entries in specific circumstances so I'm going to recommend that they add them. Thank you. From: Leonard Mills [mailto:l...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 2:52 PM To: Ward, Mike S; bind-users@lists

Re: Reverse address entries

2013-06-28 Thread Leonard Mills
At about Friday, June 28, 2013 10:54 AM Ward, Mike S" wrote: >Hello all, is there any reason to setup reverse address entries >for a zone? It very much depends on the reasons for the forward entries.  For example: Commercial backup software for Microsoft servers require forward-reverse-forwa

Re: Reverse address entries

2013-06-28 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:57:44 -0400 "Novosielski, Ryan" wrote: > The short answer is "some software once cared." Does it still now, I'm > not sure. But we do it. Some still does Niall O'Reilly ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mail

Re: Reverse address entries

2013-06-28 Thread Mark Elkins
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 17:54 +, Ward, Mike S wrote: > Hello all, is there any reason to setup reverse address entries for a > zone? I have asked some of the admins here and the consensus from them > is that only A records are necessary. Is this true? (IPv4 hat on) I've taught my staff to plan u

Re: Reverse address entries

2013-06-28 Thread Charles Swiger
On Jun 28, 2013, at 10:54 AM, "Ward, Mike S" wrote: > Hello all, is there any reason to setup reverse address entries for a zone? Certainly. Various software performs what's called a double-reverse lookup to confirm that the A and PTR records match. > I have asked some of the admins here and th

Re: Reverse address entries

2013-06-28 Thread Novosielski, Ryan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The short answer is "some software once cared." Does it still now, I'm not sure. But we do it. On 06/28/2013 01:56 PM, Ward, Mike S wrote: > Hello all, is there any reason to setup reverse address entries for > a zone? I have asked some of the admins

Reverse address entries

2013-06-28 Thread Ward, Mike S
Hello all, is there any reason to setup reverse address entries for a zone? I have asked some of the admins here and the consensus from them is that only A records are necessary. Is this true? == This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended

Re: sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout

2013-06-28 Thread Dennis Clarke
> >I have a recent build of BIND 9.9.3-P1 and after bringing up the service > >on a > >Solaris 10 server I begin to see many log entries like so : > > > >28-Jun-2013 15:41:17.636 sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout > > > >I don't know what this is and am mildly concerned. Is this evidence

Re: sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout

2013-06-28 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Dennis Clarke Date: Friday, June 28, 2013 11:43 AM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout > >I have a recent build of BIND 9.9.3-P1 and after bringing up the service >on a >Solaris 10 server I begin to see many log en

sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout

2013-06-28 Thread Dennis Clarke
I have a recent build of BIND 9.9.3-P1 and after bringing up the service on a Solaris 10 server I begin to see many log entries like so : 28-Jun-2013 15:41:17.636 sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout I don't know what this is and am mildly concerned. Is this evidence of a config problem