Hi there,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Brian Cuttler wrote:
# /usr/bin/nslint -ddd -c /etc/dns-source/named.conf-test
nslint: doconf: opened /etc/dns-source/named.conf-test
nslint: doconf: opened nslint.conf
nslint: 0/131072 items used, 0 errors
Problem - I know there are errors.
It's late and I hav
Len,
Following up on a hunch - I removed the "view" statement
and the second view from the named.conf.
I get a screen full of errors when I ran nslint.
Was headed for the release notes... but my machine was out of
service for several hours.
Hope that I do not have to maintain a separate non-vi
> From: John Horne
> > dns1.plymouth.ac.uk.rpz-nsdomainCNAME *.
> But the example zone file further down the page has the example:
>
>ns.domain.com.rpz-nsdname CNAME .
>
> So is 'rpz-nsdomain' wrong then in the zone file and 'rpz-nsdname'
> should be used instead?
"rpz-nsdomai
On 21.06.13 13:35, Brian Cuttler wrote:
# /usr/bin/nslint -ddd -c /etc/dns-source/named.conf-test
nslint: doconf: opened /etc/dns-source/named.conf-test
nslint: doconf: opened nslint.conf
nslint: 0/131072 items used, 0 errors
Looking at "nslint" output on my machine, the nslint seems to have ma
Len,
Fair enough.
When I mispoint the -c option or misname the file I get an error
that its not found.
When I change the name of a database file in in the named.conf
zone definition it doesn't seem to notice.
So, yes, I agree that we are reading no data, but it seems
to know if its finding the
I thought I had read somewhere (which I can't locate), that
additional-from-auth can be used in global or view scope.
- Original Message -
> On 21.06.13 02:00, blrmaani wrote:
> >The additional-from-auth yes_or_no ; option is a global option. I
> >would
> > like to know if there is a per-
Hi Brian,
I don't understand why you would expect to see errors, when nslint says:
nslint: 0/131072 items used, 0 errors
Zero items used/checked strongly implies zero errors can be detected.
hth,
Len
>
> From: Brian Cuttler
>To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
OK, Jeff, would it be possible for you to share the entire non-delivery
notification as seen by one of your customers? (You might have to establish an
account at Y!, gmail, etc. for your customer to use in sending the NDN, in
which case have the customer include the full headers from the NDN in
- Original Message -
> https://www.isc.org/blogs/hijacking-dns-error-ddos-what-happened-and-what-you-can-do/
>
> From ISC Support Engineering staff
Yeah...yesterday I did an 'rndc flush' on all my caching servers. I have a
script to do 'rndc flushname ' on all our servers, but at the t
Please let me know if there is a more appropriate list.
Here is a question you probably don't hear every day.
Background:
We are moving our DNS from a Solaris platform to Centos
Action:
I installed
BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.4
nslint-2.1a3-1.el6.rf.x86_64.rpm
rcs
sudo
etc
on
On Jun 20, 2013, at 7:30 PM, Julie Xu wrote:
> Hi Steven, Jason, Ged and Bind expert
>
> Thanks for the reply. It is great help.
>
> However, I need ask more.
>
> For this include clause to be added in, I have also need to add DKIM records.
SPF and DKIM are unrelated. There is no way to refe
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 17:11 +0100, John Horne wrote:
>
> My understanding is that RPZ can do this, but I just cannot seem to
> configure the RPZ zone file to enable this. The zone file contains:
> =
> $TTL 1H
> @ SOA LOCALHOST. hostmaster.plymouth.ac.uk (1 1h
> 15m 30d 2
Hello,
Using BIND 9.9.3 I have been trying to do a little testing to see if we
can modify the response for NS records. I have a test server which is a
stealth secondary for our 'plymouth.ac.uk' zone. The name servers for
the zone are 'dns0.plymouth.ac.uk' and 'dns1.plymouth.ac.uk'.
So, 'dig plymo
> From: SH Development
> No, there is definitely something going on. I shut down our
> ns2.starionhost.net this morning for a while. Sure enough, emails
> started bouncing from customers even though our ns1.starionhost.net
> is up and on the faster machine.
What exactly do the delivery fail
On 21.06.13 08:30, SH Development wrote:
No, there is definitely something going on. I shut down our
ns2.starionhost.net this morning for a while. Sure enough, emails started
bouncing from customers even though our ns1.starionhost.net is up and on
the faster machine.
depends on the error mess
Sounds more like your mailserver is misconfigured and not resolving
DNS correctly or not failing over (what is your mail server?).
Without seriously in-depth configuration/logs being posted there isn't
much we can help with.
Steve
On 21 June 2013 14:30, SH Development wrote:
> No, there is de
No, there is definitely something going on. I shut down our
ns2.starionhost.net this morning for a while. Sure enough, emails started
bouncing from customers even though our ns1.starionhost.net is up and on the
faster machine.
Jeff
On Jun 21, 2013, at 5:38 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 20.06.13 23:02, SH Development wrote:
I agree that the incoming and outgoing are different issues. I just
mention it because I dealt with issues on both fronts today. The few
claims that I had about email not being delivered were proved false by
reviewing the logs that showed they had actual
On 21.06.13 02:00, blrmaani wrote:
The additional-from-auth yes_or_no ; option is a global option. I would
like to know if there is a per-zone configuration to do the same in BIND9
configuration? I couldn't find it in BIND9 ARM.
What is the point of your question?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, u
The additional-from-auth yes_or_no ; option is a global option. I would like to
know if there is a per-zone configuration to do the same in BIND9
configuration? I couldn't find it in BIND9 ARM.
Thanks!
Blr
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailm
20 matches
Mail list logo
