Re: Classless PTR query issue

2013-05-07 Thread Doug Barton
On 05/07/2013 01:50 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 07.05.13 11:06, Michael Varre wrote: So interestingly they did give me their setup and this is their response, and my warm and fuzzy feeling continues to go out the window: They use SimpleDNS Record Name: 65.246.59.108.in-addr.arpa DNS Se

Re: Classless PTR query issue

2013-05-07 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 07.05.13 11:06, Michael Varre wrote: So interestingly they did give me their setup and this is their response, and my warm and fuzzy feeling continues to go out the window: They use SimpleDNS Record Name: 65.246.59.108.in-addr.arpa DNS Server (FQDN): dns1.kishmish.com. TTL: 1 Hour I'd ima

Re: Classless PTR query issue

2013-05-07 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Justin T Pryzby wrote: > It appears they may have manually added NS records for each of 64 IPs. > That's messy and inelegant for them, and doesn't work right either. > The ISP is responding with NS for 90.1.1.1, which means that the next > query must ask a quesion *below* that: some

Re: Classless PTR query issue

2013-05-07 Thread Michael Varre
and so much for keeping my ip's and hosts private :) ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Classless PTR query issue

2013-05-07 Thread Justin T Pryzby
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:52:16AM -0700, Michael Varre wrote: > Thanks Justin, I've been testing with dig and that's how I got the failed > results posted previously. My digs lead me to believe their zones are named > the same as mine, with -'s instead of /'s. > > dig -x 1.1.1.90 +trace >

Re: Classless PTR query issue

2013-05-07 Thread Michael Varre
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 12:04:10 PM UTC-4, Justin T Pryzby wrote: > I recommend "dig +trace -x" on one of your assigned IPs. Compare with > > the result from a known-good sub-24 rev dns delegation. The ISP > > should be returning something like: > > > > 162.48.168.205.in-addr.arpa. 43200 IN

Re: Classless PTR query issue

2013-05-07 Thread Michael Varre
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 12:04:10 PM UTC-4, Justin T Pryzby wrote: > I recommend "dig +trace -x" on one of your assigned IPs. Compare with > > the result from a known-good sub-24 rev dns delegation. The ISP > > should be returning something like: > > > > 162.48.168.205.in-addr.arpa. 43200 IN

Re: Classless PTR query issue

2013-05-07 Thread Justin T Pryzby
I recommend "dig +trace -x" on one of your assigned IPs. Compare with the result from a known-good sub-24 rev dns delegation. The ISP should be returning something like: 162.48.168.205.in-addr.arpa. 43200 IN CNAME 162.160-175.48.168.205.in-addr.arpa. 160-175.48.168.205.in-addr.arpa. 43200 I

Re: Classless PTR query issue

2013-05-07 Thread Michael Varre
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 11:34:07 AM UTC-4, Barry Margolin wrote: > In article , > > Michael Varre wrote: > > > > > I'm setting up a new zone, similar to the many I've created successfully on > > > other ISPs to answer with PTR records for a /26 the ISP has sub-delegated > > to > > > my d

Re: Classless PTR query issue

2013-05-07 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Michael Varre wrote: > I'm setting up a new zone, similar to the many I've created successfully on > other ISPs to answer with PTR records for a /26 the ISP has sub-delegated to > my dns servers and it continues to fail: > > May 7 08:18:31 dns1 named[25328]: client 1.1.1.1#62125

Classless PTR query issue

2013-05-07 Thread Michael Varre
I'm setting up a new zone, similar to the many I've created successfully on other ISPs to answer with PTR records for a /26 the ISP has sub-delegated to my dns servers and it continues to fail: May 7 08:18:31 dns1 named[25328]: client 1.1.1.1#62125: view external: query (cache) '90.1.1.1.in-ad