The last (and presumably final) point release (6.5) of NetWare was in
2003, only 4 years after RFC 2671. Just saying...
- Kevin
On 4/30/2013 7:08 PM, Pascal wrote:
Thank you. That does appear to be the problem.
-Pascal
On 4/30/2013 5:
> Patch BIND to include the RRL (Response Rate Limiting) patches
> (http://www.redbarn.org/dns/ratelimits), blackhole/ignore those
> clients requesting.
The fact that Response Rate Limiting (RRL) does not blackhole/ignore
clients is a feature and why it is a better mitigation for DNS
Reflection Do
Thank you. That does appear to be the problem.
-Pascal
On 4/30/2013 5:17 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
BIND 9.9 dig turns on EDNS by default. You really should be asking
why 172.31.123.6 doesn't suppport EDNS nearly 14 years after it was
specified (RFC 2671 August 1999).
Add +noedns to the comman
Sorry, I guess I wasn't clear enough. I was just using
www.alarmspecs.com as a sample domain. As you see, that domain is
working fine.
My problem is 172.31.123.6 is a NetWare DNS server. I maintain several
in different locations and trees. Any time I try to use Dig 9.9 against
one of them
In message <51803fd2.3070...@users.sourceforge.net>, Pascal writes:
> Dig 9.9 consistently gives me "FORMERR" against NetWare DNS servers.
> Previous versions worked fine. Suggestions on how to figure out if the
> bug is in Dig or NetWare?
>
> -Pascal
BIND 9.9 dig turns on EDNS by default. Y
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 17:04 -0500, Pascal wrote:
> Dig 9.9 consistently gives me "FORMERR" against NetWare DNS servers.
> Previous versions worked fine. Suggestions on how to figure out if the
> bug is in Dig or NetWare?
>
> -Pascal
>
> O:\Documents and Settings\admin\dig\9.9.2-P2>dig www.
Dig 9.9 consistently gives me "FORMERR" against NetWare DNS servers.
Previous versions worked fine. Suggestions on how to figure out if the
bug is in Dig or NetWare?
-Pascal
O:\Documents and Settings\admin\dig>dig www.alarmspecs.com @172.31.123.6
; <<>> DiG 9.8.4-P2 <<>> www.alarmspecs.com
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 22:07 +0100, Steven Carr wrote:
> You asked this question a few weeks ago.
>
> Patch BIND to include the RRL (Response Rate Limiting) patches
> (http://www.redbarn.org/dns/ratelimits), blackhole/ignore those
> clients requesting.
>
Many people will not compromise critical
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Jose Manuel Delgado G. wrote:
I have isc.org attack." isc.org internet *?". It comes from my own clients
that I have allowed in my ACL. the question is how to stop this attack?
this causes my traffic on the interface is intense and also up my cpu
percentage. that I can do t
You asked this question a few weeks ago.
Patch BIND to include the RRL (Response Rate Limiting) patches
(http://www.redbarn.org/dns/ratelimits), blackhole/ignore those
clients requesting.
On 30 April 2013 21:49, Jose Manuel Delgado G. wrote:
> I have isc.org attack." isc.org internet *?". It com
I have isc.org attack."* isc.org internet *?".* It comes from my own
clients that I have allowed in my ACL. the question is how to stop this
attack? this causes my traffic on the interface is intense and also up my
cpu percentage.
that I can do to prevent it??
__
> If the 'type' info in a zone statement determines master or slave, can
> you have 2 views in the same named.conf file, one with type master zones
> and the other with type slave zones?
There are a couple of ways to read this question, and the answer depends
on which way you intended it.
A quer
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 04:36:52PM +, Manson, John wrote:
> If the 'type' info in a zone statement determines master or slave,
Yes, this is so. There are other types as well, such as hint, stub,
and forward. See Bv9ARM.ch06.html#zone_statement_grammar for details
and other types.
> can you
I think views have mostly to do with the source of the queries, thus
presenting a different 'view' of zone data depending on who the client is.
You could have one view only with master zones and other view with salve
zones, but I'm not sure what the purpose would be, unless for example
you want to
If the 'type' info in a zone statement determines master or slave, can you have
2 views in the same named.conf file, one with type master zones and the other
with type slave zones?
John Manson
CAO/HIR/NAF Data-Communications | U.S. House of Representatives | Washington,
DC 20515
Desk: 202-226
On 27/04/2013 14:55, Mark Elkins wrote:
If you live in Africa and can get South, ZACR (UniForum SA), the "co.za"
registry people provide free DNS Courses in Johannesburg and Cape Town.
You still have to cover personal travel, food and lodging though.
These are proper DNS training courses, three d
On 30/04/13 10:30, Dave Warren wrote:
> On 2013-04-30 00:49, Sten Carlsen wrote:
>> Don't forget that most users will get the address out of "some"
>> cache, not directly from the authoritative servers.
>
> Absolutely. This is even more true in our case as many of our clients
> are serve very loca
On 2013-04-30 00:49, Sten Carlsen wrote:
Don't forget that most users will get the address out of "some" cache,
not directly from the authoritative servers.
Absolutely. This is even more true in our case as many of our clients
are serve very local areas and 2-3 ISPs and 3-4 mobile providers
p
Don't forget that most users will get the address out of "some" cache,
not directly from the authoritative servers.
On 30/04/13 6:48, Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 9:01 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
>> With the vast majority of our customers being in North America (probably 75%
>> of users
19 matches
Mail list logo
