rate limit dns query response ...

2013-04-03 Thread prakash
e $client$ parameter appears to work for zone transfers, as > per this > >> example https://github.com/opennetadmin/ona/wiki/bind-dlz > >> However if I use $client$ on any other queries bind segfaults. > >> > >> Strace doesn't seem to show anything use

Re: bind-users Digest, Vol 1487, Issue 2

2013-04-03 Thread prakash
e $client$ parameter appears to work for zone transfers, as > per this > >> example https://github.com/opennetadmin/ona/wiki/bind-dlz > >> However if I use $client$ on any other queries bind segfaults. > >> > >> Strace doesn't seem to show anything use

Re: Forward First on Master Zone (bypass SOA)

2013-04-03 Thread Doug Barton
On 04/03/2013 05:30 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote: It's still not clear to me what you think is the "right" way to do it. I'm not saying that there is only one right way. I'm saying you first have to answer the question, "What might we want to achieve by having different answers internally vs. extern

Re: is NS record pointing to "some other name server" needed in case of classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegations?

2013-04-03 Thread Doug Barton
On 04/02/2013 12:47 AM, Martin T wrote: Is NS record pointing to "some other name server" needed in case of classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegations? What happens if one does not specify this? It's very common for the parent name server(s) to slave the 2317 zone so that it can answer directly. It's

Re: DLZ $client% parameter segfault

2013-04-03 Thread Evan Hunt
> Thanks certainly blows up the possibility of doing native GeoDNS at the > moment? Any chance I am overlooking a method which I could effectively > get the clients address into a MySQL query with the current 9.9.2 > release? It's not quite the same as %client%, but I suggest you take a look at co

Re: Forward First on Master Zone (bypass SOA)

2013-04-03 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 4/2/2013 2:00 AM, Doug Barton wrote: On 04/01/2013 11:46 AM, Kevin Darcy wrote: On 3/29/2013 12:09 AM, Doug Barton wrote: On 03/28/2013 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote: My organization is evaluating the use of split-view DNS in our environment. Simple ... don't do it. It's almost n

Re: RPZ and negative answers

2013-04-03 Thread Chris Buxton
On Apr 3, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Vernon Schryver wrote: >> From: Chris Buxton > >> If a name exists in the response policy, and also exists in the real >> Internet namespace, the value from the policy is returned. But if it >> doesn't exist out on the Internet, then the value is not returned -- >> an

Re: RPZ and negative answers

2013-04-03 Thread Vernon Schryver
> From: Chris Buxton > If a name exists in the response policy, and also exists in the real > Internet namespace, the value from the policy is returned. But if it > doesn't exist out on the Internet, then the value is not returned -- > an NXDOMAIN (or SERVFAIL, or whatever) is returned instead. >

Re: DLZ $client% parameter segfault

2013-04-03 Thread Michael McConnell
Thanks certainly blows up the possibility of doing native GeoDNS at the moment… Any chance I am overlooking a method which I could effectively get the clients address into a MySQL query with the current 9.9.2 release? Thanks again, Michael -- Michael McConnell WINK Streaming; email: mich...@wi

Re: is NS record pointing to "some other name server" needed in case of classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegations?

2013-04-03 Thread Mark Andrews
If a zone is being made available to the public (which these are) then steps should be taken to ensure it is resolvable all the time. This means having multiple servers that are not subject to common failures. This is basic DNS. In message , Martin T writes: > Hi, > > in case of classless IN-

Re: Blocking private addresses with a optionq

2013-04-03 Thread Vernon Schryver
> From: "Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng." > First thing that got my attention was that "The rules encoded in a > response policy zone (RPZ) are applied only to responses to queries > that ask for recursion". But, these are authoritative only nameservers > So, would RPZ work in this case? This is s

Re: Auto-dnssec maintain and 'continous' resigning

2013-04-03 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <515a92a5.3020...@imperial.ac.uk>, Phil Mayers writes: > On 04/01/2013 07:36 PM, Carlos M. Martinez wrote: > > Reframing the question in more general terms... Which events trigger a > > zone re-sign and reload when using "auto-dnssec maintain" ? > > As someone else has already said, zo

Re: RPZ and negative answers

2013-04-03 Thread Noel Butler
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 14:16 -0700, Chris Buxton wrote: > Can anyone explain this to me? > > If a name exists in the response policy, and also exists in the real Internet > namespace, the value from the policy is returned. But if it doesn't exist out > on the Internet, then the value is not retu

Re: DLZ $client% parameter segfault

2013-04-03 Thread Vadim S. Goncharov
On 02.04.2013 01:13, Michael McConnell wrote: Unfortunatelly, $client$ is only supported in allowzonexfr() method (see e.g. http://bind-dlz.sourceforge.net/mysql_driver.html for some info about SDLZ methods). It would be nice to have it in others, too, but BIND does not pass it via current API

Re: Blocking private addresses with a optionq

2013-04-03 Thread Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
- Original Message - > > From: "Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng." > > > ... So, being able to filter out these 'bad' things when responding > > queries against that data might be a good thing. > > RPZ might be used for such things. However, by design RPZ rewrites > entire responses. It is tr

RPZ and negative answers

2013-04-03 Thread Chris Buxton
Can anyone explain this to me? If a name exists in the response policy, and also exists in the real Internet namespace, the value from the policy is returned. But if it doesn't exist out on the Internet, then the value is not returned -- an NXDOMAIN (or SERVFAIL, or whatever) is returned instea

is NS record pointing to "some other name server" needed in case of classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegations?

2013-04-03 Thread Martin T
Hi, in case of classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegations(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2317.txt) I have usually seen at least one NS record pointing to name server other than the end-customer ones. Example from rfc2317.txt where there are two NS records and the second one is not the end-customer name server

Re: Auto-dnssec maintain and 'continous' resigning

2013-04-03 Thread Phil Mayers
On 04/01/2013 07:36 PM, Carlos M. Martinez wrote: Reframing the question in more general terms... Which events trigger a zone re-sign and reload when using "auto-dnssec maintain" ? As someone else has already said, zone updates, signature expiration and key events. In particular, it's normal

Re: Forward First on Master Zone (bypass SOA)

2013-04-03 Thread Doug Barton
On 04/01/2013 11:46 AM, Kevin Darcy wrote: On 3/29/2013 12:09 AM, Doug Barton wrote: On 03/28/2013 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote: My organization is evaluating the use of split-view DNS in our environment. Simple ... don't do it. It's almost never the right answer, and as you're lear

Re: DLZ $client% parameter segfault

2013-04-03 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Michael McConnell writes: > > The $client$ parameter appears to work for zone transfers, as per this = > example https://github.com/opennetadmin/ona/wiki/bind-dlz > However if I use $client$ on any other queries bind segfaults. > > Strace doesn't seem to show anything useful... >