Unwanted resolver usage of /etc/host.conf

Hi. Although not a BIND-related issue, I would like to ask if someone could explain the conditions under which a compiled C program on Linux could be made to have a name resolution dependency on the settings within the file `/etc/host.conf'. As I understand things, host.conf is the ancestor of t

Re: Configure error - BIND10, 1.0.0 on Mac OS X 10.8.2

At Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:30:55 +1100, James Brown wrote: > Received an error running configure on Mountain Lion: > > ./configure > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c > checking whether build environment is sane... yes > checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... ./install-sh

Configure error - BIND10, 1.0.0 on Mac OS X 10.8.2

Received an error running configure on Mountain Lion: ./configure checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... ./install-sh -c -d checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... no checking for na

Re: Most specific match on PTR records

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 02/22/2013 01:26 AM, Nikita Koshikov wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Doug Barton > > wrote: >> >> Can you slave the 11.2.10.in-addr.arpa zone instead of forwarding? >> That would be ea

Re: Registrar that supports self-run domains and provides DNSSEC support

Could we knock off the politics please? I view the recent few posts as ignorant nonsense (complete with poor spelling AND Ayn Rand -- a twofer!), but I'm not inclined to take us further off topic by responding to it. From: Shawn Bakhtiar [mailto:shashan...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 2

RE: Registrar that supports self-run domains and provides DNSSEC support

Well said. government is a bloated waist of money, however, look at what happened when Ma'bell was broken up. Unix became proprietary and languished while DOS dominated the world. Look at what happened when we deregulated energy in California 2 decades ago, prices shot up, and price gouging ne

Re: Registrar that supports self-run domains and provides DNSSEC support

On 02/22/2013 10:51 AM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote: I know this last bit from experience, having worked at CELECs back in the day and running an ISP that was severely underfunded because the Internet was "new" and couldn't be trusted like a telephone. Lots of committed people working long h

Re: Most specific match on PTR records

On 02/22/2013 01:26 AM, Nikita Koshikov wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Doug Barton mailto:do...@dougbarton.us>> wrote: Can you slave the 11.2.10.in-addr.arpa zone instead of forwarding? That would be easier, and avoid the pitfalls already described by others. I can't, 1

Re: Registrar that supports self-run domains and provides DNSSEC support

-Original Message- From: Shawn Bakhtiar Date: Friday, February 22, 2013 12:06 AM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: RE: Registrar that supports self-run domains and provides DNSSEC support >2) We don't buy or maintain street addresses from a for profit company, >why should domain

Re: Most specific match on PTR records

On 21.02.2013 19:20, Nikita Koshikov wrote: I'm trying to "cut" /24 network from the scope of /8 network, here is example: zone "11.2.10.in-addr.arpa" { type forward; forwarders { 192.168.1.23; 192.168.1.24; }; }; zone "10.in-addr.arpa" {

Re: Most specific match on PTR records

Thanks Mark, for elegant solution. It works. Thanks. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message ooq01ugyvw_...@mail.gmail.com>, Nikita Koshiko > v writes: > > Hello list, > > > > > > I'm trying to "cut" /24 network from the scope of /8 network, here is > > example: > >

Re: Most specific match on PTR records

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 02/21/2013 10:20 AM, Nikita Koshikov wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >> >> I'm trying to "cut" /24 network from the scope of /8 network, here is >> example: >> >> zone "11.2.10.in-addr.arpa" { >> type forward; >>

Re: Most specific match on PTR records

Thanks for your response, Hauke On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Hauke Lampe wrote: > On 21.02.2013 19:20, Nikita Koshikov wrote: > > I haven't tested this in detail but here's what I would try: > > > I'm trying to "cut" /24 network from the scope of /8 network, here is >> example: >> >>