Re: Slaving from DNS masters behind LVS

2013-02-12 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
Note: Removing cross-post, but feel free to forward. -Original Message- From: Nick Urbanik Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 10:00 PM To: "keepalived-de...@lists.sourceforge.net" , "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: Slaving from DNS masters behind LVS >Dear Folks, > >We have a pair of

Slaving from DNS masters behind LVS

2013-02-12 Thread Nick Urbanik
Dear Folks, We have a pair of DNS servers running BIND behind a direct routing LVS director pair running keepalived. Let's call these two DNS servers A and B, and the VIP V. They slave from a hidden master; let's call it M. I want to allow another machine S to slave from A and B, the pair of D

Re: libbind 6.0

2013-02-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <6134bb3286a31d4db61e57114e8ba7c09152e...@seaembx01.olympus.f5net.co m>, Jack Tavares writes: > I haven't seen any answer on list, so I am resending in case > it got lost in "late Friday afternoon" mail queue. > > Thank you: > > > I have been using libbind(6.0) to do dynamic updates

RE: libbind 6.0

2013-02-12 Thread Jack Tavares
I haven't seen any answer on list, so I am resending in case it got lost in "late Friday afternoon" mail queue. Thank you: I have been using libbind(6.0) to do dynamic updates via res_mkupdate() libbind is not currently under development. Is there are replacement in bind9 that I should move t