> >I have software that reads the stats channel.
>
> Me too. Took awhile to get right, I'd hate to see it break. :-(
The plan is, it *will* break in 9.10, but not in 9.9 (unless you turn
the new stats on with the configure option).
I'd love it if you'd try it, actually, find out how hard it is
Maybe it will chug along for a while if you don't configure with newstats.
But suppose someday you want to update to the newer, better software.
Are you going to run a separate server to test against?
If you manage more than one server, when the monitoring software
changes, are all the servers
Thanks for sharing Lawrence. One thing I wanted to ask the list is whether
it would make more sense to have
a KSK rollover a month before the domain expires? What would be cons and
pros?
Thanks,
- Andrew.
Andrew Petrov
IT Security Engineering
NYC DoITT
-Original Message-
From: bind-
Hi,
I'm trying to automate key rollover with BIND 9.9.2 (will soon upgrade
to new rev). I have a couple of elementary questions that seem to be
answered briefly in the documentation, but I suspect that my grasp of
key rollover is clouded by the last decade of blog posts about tools
and techniques
In message
, Mauricio
Tavares writes:
> so I want to define a reverse dns zone to handle 172.16.101.64/27. In
> the named.conf file I set:
>
> acl bogusnets {
> 0.0.0.0/8;
> 1.0.0.0/8;
> 2.0.0.0/8;
> 192.0.2.0/24;
> 224.0.0.0/3;
> 10.0.0.0/8;
>
-Original Message-
From: Timothe Litt
Date: Friday, January 25, 2013 6:13 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: BIND 9.9.3b1 is now available
>On 25-Jan-13 17:32, Michael McNally wrote:
>> BIND 9.9.3b1 is the first beta release of BIND 9.9.3.
>>
>> Makes available a new X
On 25-Jan-13 17:32, Michael McNally wrote:
BIND 9.9.3b1 is the first beta release of BIND 9.9.3.
Makes available a new XML schema (version 3.0) for the statistics
channel that adds query type statistics at the zone level,
flattens the XML tree and uses compressed format to optimize
On 1/25/2013 2:56 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
so I want to define a reverse dns zone to handle 172.16.101.64/27. In
the named.conf file I set:
acl bogusnets {
0.0.0.0/8;
1.0.0.0/8;
2.0.0.0/8;
192.0.2.0/24;
224.0.0.0/3;
10.0.0.0/8;
!1
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Augie Schwer
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Mark Andrews
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> In message
> >> ,
> >> Augie
> >> Schwer wri
> >> tes:
> >> >
> >> > Would measuring the number of SERVFAIL entries in the
> >>
so I want to define a reverse dns zone to handle 172.16.101.64/27. In
the named.conf file I set:
acl bogusnets {
0.0.0.0/8;
1.0.0.0/8;
2.0.0.0/8;
192.0.2.0/24;
224.0.0.0/3;
10.0.0.0/8;
!172.16.101.64/27;
172.16.0.0/12;
192.168
Introduction
BIND 9.6-ESV-R9b1 is the first beta release of BIND 9.6-ESV-R9.
BIND 9.6-ESV is an Extended Support Version of BIND.
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.6-ESV-R8 to BIND
9.6-ESV-R9b1. Please see the CHANGES file in the source code
release for a complete list
Introduction
BIND 9.9.3b1 is the first beta release of BIND 9.9.3.
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.9.2 to BIND 9.9.3b1.
Please see the CHANGES file in the source code release for a
complete list of all changes.
Download
The latest versions of BIND 9 software can alwa
Introduction
BIND 9.8.5b1 is the first beta release of BIND 9.8.5
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.8.4 to BIND 9.8.5b1.
Please see the CHANGES file in the source code release for a
complete list of all changes.
Download
The latest versions of BIND 9 software can alway
> Note that the log message related to outgoing zone transfers from named,
The shame! That's what I get for being at it 17 hours non-stop. I
overlooked the -out. Sorry and thank you, Tony.
-JP
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listi
ip admin wrote:
>
> Any idea why the wildcard matching is affected by the individual
> levels/labels of
> hello.test.com?
See RFC 4592 "The Role of Wildcards in the Domain Name System", section
2.2 "Existence Rules" and especially 2.2.2 "Empty Non-terminals":
2.2. Existence Rules
The notio
Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
>
> On Fri Jan 25 2013 at 13:45:58 CET, Ben Croswell wrote:
> > A common issue is the secondary not being allowed to query the master for
> > the SOA of the zone. Ensure the master has an allow-query that includes the
> > secondary.
>
> The BIND slave can query the PowerDNS m
Hello,
I want to have a dummy (internal) root NS to resolve specific name
hello.test.com to 4.5.6.7, everything else to 1.2.3.4.
Using a wildcard does not work as expected (by me), though.
1st attempt:
# cat db.root
$TTL 86400
@ IN SOA ns1.root.internal.
dnsadmin.
On Fri Jan 25 2013 at 13:45:58 CET, Ben Croswell wrote:
> A common issue is the secondary not being allowed to query the master for
> the SOA of the zone. Ensure the master has an allow-query that includes the
> secondary.
The BIND slave can query the PowerDNS master (for the SOA over UDP and
for
A common issue is the secondary not being allowed to query the master for
the SOA of the zone. Ensure the master has an allow-query that includes the
secondary.
On Jan 25, 2013 6:06 AM, "Jan-Piet Mens" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm seeing quite a number of messages like
>
> xfer-out: debug 3: c
Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
>
> I'm seeing quite a number of messages like
>
> xfer-out: debug 3: client 192.168.1.2#54688 (example.com): zone
> transfer setup failed
>From the source it looks like it will always precede this message with
another log line stating the reason. There are lots of p
Hello,
I'm seeing quite a number of messages like
xfer-out: debug 3: client 192.168.1.2#54688 (example.com): zone
transfer setup failed
BIND 9.9.2P1 here, configured with:
request-ixfr no;
transfer-format many-answers;
transfers-in 100;
transfers-per-ns
21 matches
Mail list logo
