Re: set directory for "auto" key files

2013-01-09 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:59:51PM +, Tony Finch wrote: > Chris Thompson wrote: > > One slight niggling disadvantage is that you can't tell > > named-checkzone / named-compilezone with the -j option where > > to find the journal is it isn't in the default location. > > I submited a patch to a

Re: Sharing zones between views to conserve memory

2013-01-09 Thread Sten Carlsen
IIRC provided you do NOT update the common zones dynamically, you can share the files. This is a dirty solution, the risk is that on e view may change a file and the other views using it will be out of sync. On 10/01/13 0:34, Kevin Darcy wrote: > On 1/9/2013 10:57 AM, Carl Byington wrote: >>

Re: Sharing zones between views to conserve memory

2013-01-09 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 1/9/2013 10:57 AM, Carl Byington wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:37 +0200, Jan Gutter wrote: So, here's my question: is there a way to share zones between views to conserve memory? One way is to put the master copy of those large zones in one vi

Re: Name resolution fails if not forwarding

2013-01-09 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/09/2013 06:17 AM, Daniele wrote: I installed BIND9 via `apt-get` on a newly installed UBUNTU 12.04, virtualized on VirtualBox. Make sure you've disabled the built-in dnsmasq instance on the Ubuntu system. ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org

Re: lame-servers: error (FORMERR) resolving [something]

2013-01-09 Thread Lyle Giese
On 01/09/13 08:39, Daniele wrote: 2013/1/9 Phil Mayers > On 09/01/13 13:53, Daniele wrote: This is the scenario. I installed BIND9 via `apt-get` on a newly installed UBUNTU 12.04, virtualized on VirtualBox. The network works p

replysize problem

2013-01-09 Thread Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
Anybody know anything about F5 Big-IPs? I was doing the replysize test on various DNS servers that I maintain, and found two are reporting a replysize limit less than 3843 (the result that I get for all my other DNS servers.) And, with those two, they will alternate between a limit that is a f

Re: query about EDNS UDP Packet

2013-01-09 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Gaurav Kansal Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 12:34 AM To: Sten Carlsen , "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: Re: query about EDNS UDP Packet >Thanks for help. >My Firewall was dropping packet size larger than 512 bytes. >Cisco 5580 having ASA 8.3. It is by def

Re: gitnamed, a project to manage name server by git

2013-01-09 Thread 彭勇
updated, i add a hook to validate and auto incement serial of SOA Feature of GitNamed a frame to manage your DNS server put all your DNS data into git, and you have a revision for your DNS data, you can backup and restore them easily it's easy to manage your DNS resource record, just edit and com

Re: Name resolution fails if not forwarding

2013-01-09 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Daniele Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 9:17 AM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: Re: Name resolution fails if not forwarding >This is the scenario. > >I installed BIND9 via `apt-get` on a newly installed UBUNTU 12.04, >virtualized on VirtualBox. >The net

Re: set directory for "auto" key files

2013-01-09 Thread Tony Finch
Chris Thompson wrote: > > One slight niggling disadvantage is that you can't tell > named-checkzone / named-compilezone with the -j option where > to find the journal is it isn't in the default location. I submited a patch to add a -J option which addresses this problem. (RT #30958) Tony. -- f.

Re: Sharing zones between views to conserve memory

2013-01-09 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:37 +0200, Jan Gutter wrote: > So, here's my question: is there a way to share zones between views to > conserve memory? One way is to put the master copy of those large zones in one view, then define those zones in the other v

Re: lame-servers: error (FORMERR) resolving [something]

2013-01-09 Thread Daniele
2013/1/9 Phil Mayers > On 09/01/13 13:53, Daniele wrote: > >> This is the scenario. >> >> I installed BIND9 via `apt-get` on a newly installed UBUNTU 12.04, >> virtualized on VirtualBox. >> The network works properly because if I indicate a different server from >> my own BIND9 (the first line of

Re: lame-servers: error (FORMERR) resolving [something]

2013-01-09 Thread Phil Mayers
On 09/01/13 13:53, Daniele wrote: This is the scenario. I installed BIND9 via `apt-get` on a newly installed UBUNTU 12.04, virtualized on VirtualBox. The network works properly because if I indicate a different server from my own BIND9 (the first line of '/etc/resolv.conf' is, for example, `name

Re: Name resolution fails if not forwarding

2013-01-09 Thread Daniele
This is the scenario. I installed BIND9 via `apt-get` on a newly installed UBUNTU 12.04, virtualized on VirtualBox. The network works properly because if I indicate a different server from my own BIND9 (the first line of '/etc/resolv.conf' is, for example, `nameserver 8.8.8.8`) the lookups and any

Re: lame-servers: error (FORMERR) resolving [something]

2013-01-09 Thread Daniele
This is the scenario. I installed BIND9 via `apt-get` on a newly installed UBUNTU 12.04, virtualized on VirtualBox. The network works properly because if I indicate a different server from my own BIND9 (the first line of '/etc/resolv.conf' is, for example, `nameserver 8.8.8.8`) the lookups and any

Sharing zones between views to conserve memory

2013-01-09 Thread Jan Gutter
Hi I've come across an interesting scalability issue with regards to how our organization uses BIND. I'm putting up the question here, but I have a sneaky suspicion that I'll have to solve this problem in the source code. The way we use BIND seems to be slightly non-obvious, and I'm really after a