>> So I'm sitting here scrathing my head even more confused than
>> usual. Anyone have any insights?
>
> The SOA has the wrong owner name. Bind followed a referral for
> map.media6degrees.com but the SOA wrongly says the zone apex is
> media6degrees.com.
>
> https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-us
Hi John,
Thanks... checking the syslog show me a permission issue on the
rndc.key...
it was bind:bind, I change it to root:bind and it works successfully now,
and I don't have the 53 port issue...
Many THanks John for making me check the obvious lol ;))
Regards,
Thomas.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012
Yes, firewall was checked, I've tryed without, and remote access with
telnet and I could connect.
Thanks for your help.
Thomas.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
> Have you checked the host level firewall (e.g. iptables)?
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-
Have you checked the host level firewall (e.g. iptables)?
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of John
Miller
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 12:01 PM
To: bind-users@list
Hi Thomas,
Since this is Ubuntu, what does /var/log/syslog have to say about the
matter? Do you have any specific configuration for rndc controls, or
are you primarily using the stock Ubuntu named.conf.local and
named.conf.options?
John
On 10/04/2012 11:27 AM, Thomas Manson wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I had to change of server because the previous was getting old, and I had
to do it very fast because of a mis-communication of my host...
I'm on Ubuntu 12.04 server, x86_64.
root@ns0:/etc/bind# aptitude show bind9
Package: bind9
New: yes
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Versi
Havard Eidnes wrote:
> So I'm sitting here scrathing my head even more confused than
> usual. Anyone have any insights?
The SOA has the wrong owner name. Bind followed a referral for
map.media6degrees.com but the SOA wrongly says the zone apex is
media6degrees.com.
https://lists.isc.org/piperm
Hi,
I've semi-recently updated a public resolver to running a bit newer
version of BIND, currently at 9.8.4-P3.
I've noticed that quite a number of query responses it receives
are logged with "DNS format error" ... "invalid response". Some
semi-random examples picked from the log:
apis.markets.
Hello,
I was curious if the underlying protocol used by the rndc command was well
documented and if writing clients against it (rather than using the rndc
utility) was advisable or not.
Thanks,
-- Matthew Horsfall (alh)
___
Please visit https://lis
Mark Andrews wrote:
> > Why does named complain in this manner?
>
> It's fallout from the type code roll from KEY to DNSKEY. KEY can
> exist beside CNAME so the CNAME is not followed for KEY, the same
> is not supposed to be true for DNSKEY. I'll open a bug ticket for
> this.
Thanks!
Tony.
--
10 matches
Mail list logo