> The other things that changed in BIND 9.9 is that there is a new version
> of the "raw" format (as in "-F raw=1" versus "-F raw=0" in named-checkzone,
> q.v. its man page).
You're right, I forgot that bit.
> What was the motivation for that change?
It's for inline signing. Raw format 1 has an
On May 4 2012, Evan Hunt wrote:
A new option was added in 9.9 to cache slave zones in 'raw' format rather
than text format.
That's actually always been an option ("masterfile-format raw;")
Well, if "always" is taken to mean "since BIND 9.4" :-)
> A new option was added in 9.9 to cache slave zones in 'raw' format rather
> than text format.
That's actually always been an option ("masterfile-format raw;") and is
recommended for servers with a lot of slave zones because it reduces
startup time considerably--it takes about half as long to loa
Hi Guys
A new option was added in 9.9 to cache slave zones in 'raw' format rather
than text format.
Is there any specific documentation on what the format of this 'raw' format
actually is?
thanks
Dave
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/list
4 matches
Mail list logo
