Re: spam on maillist, stop it !

2012-04-27 Thread Noel Butler
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 16:18 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > What you did is just as bad If you need a list moderator there are appropriate addresses to send your messages to, directly to the list is NOT one of them The information you desire can be obtained from

Re: Question about KSK

2012-04-27 Thread Tony Finch
wbr...@e1b.org wrote: > We are authoritative for a few dozen small zones. Is it possible to use > the same KSK for all of them? I can see where if it gets compromised we > would need to resign all zones using the KSK at once. How much effort > would I be saving sharing the KSK? With BIND it i

Re: Question about KSK

2012-04-27 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
> I was mistakenly thinking the KSK also had an expiration as the > the ZSK does. Keys don't expire; signatures (RRSIGs) do. -JP ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users maili

Re: Question about KSK

2012-04-27 Thread WBrown
Jan-Piet wrote on 04/27/2012 10:22:39 AM: > > When the shared KSK needed to be rolled over, you would have to > > process DS records in the parents of your few dozen zones all at the > > same time. > > *If* you want to roll the KSK, a.k.a. "when did you last roll your SSH > keys?" :-) Correct.

Re: Question about KSK

2012-04-27 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
> When the shared KSK needed to be rolled over, you would have to > process DS records in the parents of your few dozen zones all at the > same time. *If* you want to roll the KSK, a.k.a. "when did you last roll your SSH keys?" :-) -JP ___ Pleas

spam on maillist, stop it !

2012-04-27 Thread Benny Pedersen
Den 2012-04-27 00:11, Shi Jin skrev: http://guitar-stuff.net/wp-content/. spam spam spam spam and more wordpress spam spam spam ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this l

Re: Question about KSK

2012-04-27 Thread Phil Mayers
On 27/04/12 13:40, wbr...@e1b.org wrote: We are authoritative for a few dozen small zones. Is it possible to use the same KSK for all of them? I can see where if it gets compromised we would need to resign all zones using the KSK at once. How much effort would I be saving sharing the KSK? Th

RE: Question about KSK

2012-04-27 Thread Spain, Dr. Jeffry A.
> We are authoritative for a few dozen small zones. Is it possible to use the > same KSK for all of them? I can see where if it gets compromised we would > need to resign all zones using the KSK at once. How much effort would I be > saving sharing the KSK? My sense is that you would be creat

Re: Question about KSK

2012-04-27 Thread Bill Owens
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:40:54AM -0400, wbr...@e1b.org wrote: > We are authoritative for a few dozen small zones. Is it possible to use > the same KSK for all of them? I can see where if it gets compromised we > would need to resign all zones using the KSK at once. How much effort > would I

Question about KSK

2012-04-27 Thread WBrown
We are authoritative for a few dozen small zones. Is it possible to use the same KSK for all of them? I can see where if it gets compromised we would need to resign all zones using the KSK at once. How much effort would I be saving sharing the KSK? I'm sure there are plenty of other good rea

Re: Exclude a domain from DNSSEC validation, like Unbound's "domain-insecure".

2012-04-27 Thread Tony Finch
Jan-Piet Mens wrote: > > From a Comcast talk at SATIN 2012 I believe they called that a "negative > trust anchor", and IIRC, the author wanted to publish a draft of its > operation. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors There has been a lot of discussion on the IETF d