Re: A few conceptual question about dnssec.

2012-03-02 Thread dE .
On 03/03/12 12:47, dE . wrote: On 02/18/12 00:36, Gaurav kansal wrote: Firstly, where do we get the public key for the DS records? Can you clarify your question??? Second, why do I get multiple DS records as response? -- You will always get a 2 DS Records in response. One for SHA-1 and se

Re: A few conceptual question about dnssec.

2012-03-02 Thread dE .
On 02/18/12 00:36, Gaurav kansal wrote: Firstly, where do we get the public key for the DS records? Can you clarify your question??? Second, why do I get multiple DS records as response? -- You will always get a 2 DS Records in response. One for SHA-1 and second for SHA-256. I was read

Re: BIND 9.9.0 Inline-Signing Out of Control

2012-03-02 Thread Mark Andrews
Just let it complete signing the zone. This is done incrementally. sig-signing-nodes ; sig-signing-signatures ; These control the number nodes processed and signatures generated per increment. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2

BIND 9.9.0 Inline-Signing Out of Control

2012-03-02 Thread David Kreindler
When BIND 9.9.0 was released, we started converting our DNSSEC-signed zones to inline signing. Everything went smoothly with all but one of our zones ("pesky.zone", below). With that zone, after named signed it and completed an AXFR-style IXFR to each of four slaves, it proceeded to start repea

RE: RFC 6303 and bind 9.9.0

2012-03-02 Thread Spain, Dr. Jeffry A.
> Didn't the answer to the NS query include the addresses in the Additional > Section? It does when I perform the query manually. It gets cut off with > the default packet size, but if EDNS0 is used it will include them all. The addresses are included in the additional section. Missed that ear

Re: BIND 9.9.0 is now available

2012-03-02 Thread Evan Hunt
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:13:06AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > NXDOMAIN redirection is now possible. This enables a resolver > > to respond to a client with locally-configured information > > when a query would otherwise have gotten an answer of "no > > such domain". This allows a

Re: RFC 6303 and bind 9.9.0

2012-03-02 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , "Spain, Dr. Jeffry A." wrote: > >> No, it requires a rebuild after changing lib/dns/rootns.c. But using a > >> mildly out-of-date hints file is usually harmless - it is only a *hint*. > > > Right. One of the first things BIND does after starting up is query one of > > the root se

Re: BIND 9.9.0 is now available

2012-03-02 Thread Bill Owens
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:13:06AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 29.02.12 17:53, Michael McNally wrote: > > NXDOMAIN redirection is now possible. This enables a resolver > > to respond to a client with locally-configured information > > when a query would otherwise have gotten an ans

Re: BIND 9.9.0 is now available

2012-03-02 Thread Phil Mayers
On 02/03/12 10:13, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 29.02.12 17:53, Michael McNally wrote: NXDOMAIN redirection is now possible. This enables a resolver to respond to a client with locally-configured information when a query would otherwise have gotten an answer of "no such domain". This allows

RE: RFC 6303 and bind 9.9.0

2012-03-02 Thread Spain, Dr. Jeffry A.
>> No, it requires a rebuild after changing lib/dns/rootns.c. But using a >> mildly out-of-date hints file is usually harmless - it is only a *hint*. > Right. One of the first things BIND does after starting up is query one of > the root servers to get the current set of root servers. Thanks. T

RE: RFC 6303 and bind 9.9.0

2012-03-02 Thread Tony Finch
Spain, Dr. Jeffry A. wrote: > > Would you please elaborate on how you are managing your bogon-related > empty zones. I have bogon declarations and empty zones for all the ranges listed in RFC 5735 except 224.0.0.0/4 which only has a bogon declaration. (The multicast addresses shouldn't be used fo

RE: RFC 6303 and bind 9.9.0

2012-03-02 Thread Spain, Dr. Jeffry A.
>> If the root hints are updated on ftp://rs.internic.net/domain/, would >> it require a new build of bind to incorporate them, or is bind able to >> update its built-in root hints by some other means? > No, it requires a rebuild after changing lib/dns/rootns.c. But using a mildly > out-of-date

Re: BIND 9.9.0 is now available

2012-03-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 29.02.12 17:53, Michael McNally wrote: NXDOMAIN redirection is now possible. This enables a resolver to respond to a client with locally-configured information when a query would otherwise have gotten an answer of "no such domain". This allows a recursive nameserver to provide altern