Re: Bind 9.9.0b2 inline signing...

2011-12-04 Thread Danny Mayer
On 11/28/2011 4:33 PM, Bill Owens wrote: > > I think that if I had to use a Windows workstation my first installs would be the ISC binary kit and wireshark, since AFAIK Windows doesn't come with a packet capture program either. . . > There is one. I forget what it's called. I think it's in one

Re: Bind 9.9.0b2 inline signing...

2011-12-04 Thread Danny Mayer
On 11/28/2011 1:03 PM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote: > Todd wrote on 11/24/2011 11:29:14 AM: > >> I don't understand why Windows doesn't include dig by default, even >> now. Free software hate? > > And grep and logrotate! At least the GnuWin32 project has a good version > of grep. > I have a good v

Re: bind

2011-12-04 Thread Leonard Mills
From: Rajiv wrote at about Sunday, December 4, 2011 12:24 AM >Subject: bind ... > I am getting below error while  updating the new Name server >to IANA. >The NS RR-set returned by the authoritative name server [xxx.xxx.xxx] are not >the >same as the supplied ns records [xxx.x

named.ca

2011-12-04 Thread Colin Harvey
  We're running BIND 9.6.1-P3 on several machines setup to be forwarders.  Some domains are not resolvable via the forwarder, so named.ca has those domains listed with the appropriate nameservers to reach to resolve the requests.   For some reason, one host is either not using its named.ca or has

bind

2011-12-04 Thread Rajiv
Dear All I am getting below error while updating the new Name server to IANA. The NS RR-set returned by the authoritative name server [xxx.xxx.xxx] are not the same as the supplied ns records [xxx.xxx.xxx] for Name server:xxx.xxx.xxx How can I fix this error. With best r