In article ,
"Chris Balmain" wrote:
> Let's say I have two domain names, d1.com and d2.com, and I want to
> synchronise all records underneath them (one-way sync, that is). So if I
> create an A record www.d1.com pointing at 1.2.3.4, www.d2.com is also
> automatically created, with the same v
Let's say I have two domain names, d1.com and d2.com, and I want to
synchronise all records underneath them (one-way sync, that is). So if I
create an A record www.d1.com pointing at 1.2.3.4, www.d2.com is also
automatically created, with the same value. So it's almost like a
master/slave relat
Barry;
Thanks, I fixed that!
I am also not sure if that will help with the server "fail" or status
"refused" issue when checked from outside.
Eduardo
On 11/14/11 6:58 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article,
Eduardo Bonsi wrote:
Since my servers are getting status "refused" from outside, c
In article ,
Eduardo Bonsi wrote:
> Since my servers are getting status "refused" from outside, could
> someone shine me a light what is wrong here? Here is a copy of my named
> conf file for the master.
You have the same 'match-clients {any;}' clause in both the internal and
external views.
Since my servers are getting status "refused" from outside, could
someone shine me a light what is wrong here? Here is a copy of my named
conf file for the master.
Thanks!
//
// Include keys file
key rndc-key {
algorithm hmac-md5;
secret "yyxx-not-the-real-key-xmc/xxx/z/x==";
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:38:44PM -0800,
Eduardo Bonsi wrote
a message of 123 lines which said:
> if my ns1 and ns2 are responding ok to setup DNSSEC.
...
> user:~ user1$ dig bonsi.org
dig, by default, does not request DNSSEC data. If you want to test
with DNSSEC, add "+dnssec" to the comman
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 03:51:52AM +0900,
Euiho Kim wrote
a message of 215 lines which said:
> In bind-9.6 installed server, response query rcvd msg size is 600~700 byte,
>
> But bind-9.7, response rcvd msg size is 3100~3400 byte(large size), It
> includes lots of DNSSEC RRSet.
I vaguely rem
Zitat von "Adamiec, Lawrence" :
Here are some results using the same commands you used.
# dig @63.200.45.18 ns1.bonsi.org soa
; <<>> DiG 9.6.1-P3 <<>> @63.200.45.18 ns1.bonsi.org soa
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: REFUSED, id: 9
Here are some results using the same commands you used.
# dig bonsi.org
; <<>> DiG 9.6.1-P3 <<>> bonsi.org
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 1462
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
I am checking my DNS setup from inside using dig and I am getting
everything ok but I need a second opinion from outside of the server to
see if my ns1 and ns2 are responding ok to setup DNSSEC.
Thanks!
user:~ user1$ dig bonsi.org
; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R4-P3 <<>> bonsi.org
;; global options: +cm
Hi, I wrote email 1 days ago (subject name: DDoS attack and difference
actions in bind 9.6 / 9.7)
But I wonder mail could not approach to your mailbox, so I request support
again.
First, Recently “isc.org ANY” DDoS Attack is frequently generated in our
DNS System (recursive Cache DNS)
Query ty
* Gaurav Kansal:
> As root DNS are running in anycast so number is not an issue at all. But I
> don't understand where exactly is this limitation exists???
The limitation does not exist, otherwise it would not have been possible
to add IPv6 addresses to the priming response.
--
Florian Weimer
12 matches
Mail list logo
