Hi Kevin,
Thank you for your speedy reply.
Unforetuneately I believe the problem runs deeper than that, but correct me
because if I am wrong.
Hi Kevin and All,
Under Windows Vista, home edition, I went into control panel - Add or remove
user accounts.
I did not see a named account.
I tried to
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Grant Brown
wrote:
> Hi All,
> In the readme1st.txt files that comes with Bind 9.8.1 for Windows I read
>
> With BIND running under an a
Someone wrote (privately, so I'm not giving a name):
> There's a bit of problem with the DNS. You might want to jump over to
> http://dns.squish.net/ and run an NS traversal for biplane.com.au --
> pps.com.au's DNS is befuddled.
This is true. Two of the four PPS nameservers do not have glue recor
Hi All,
In the readme1st.txt files that comes with Bind 9.8.1 for Windows I read
With BIND running under an account name it is necessary for all
files and directories that BIND u
Hi
We have a Linux server running bind 9.2.4 and dhcpd in a ddns
configuration. We also have a number of windows 2008 R2 servers
running AD / DNS / dhcp on other sites. These windows servers have
stub zones configured, for the zones on the Linux server.
All worked fine up until yesterday.
Now no
Got around to adding a virtual interface on the production box (I never could
get this
working with keys alone), I had labbed this up previously in reverse of what I
needed
but transfers were broken on the production box when I reversed the views that
contained the master/slave.
The following wo
* Mark Andrews:
> Access Vector: Network exploitable
> Access Complexity: Low
> Authentication: Not required to exploit
> Impact Type:Allows disruption of service
>
> I fail to see how this could ever have been classified as
> Access Complexity: Low.
I believe the CVSS scoring for those old entri
Hi all,
I have a domain defined within a zone statement so it resolves
hostnames via the intranet, just like this:
zone "intradomain.com" { type forward; forwarders {
10.222.1.21;};};
Now there is this host which does not resolve internally (with an
intranet ip) but it does exte
8 matches
Mail list logo