Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-09 Thread TMK
On Sep 9, 2011 10:28 PM, "TMK" wrote: > > On 09.09.11 19:31, TMK wrote: >We have find the reason why our network analyzer report that bind is >responding to a.root-server.net in 30 sec. > > does your server respond to a.root-servers.net, or does > a.root-servers.netrespond to your BIND? A.root-s

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 09.09.11 19:31, TMK wrote: We have find the reason why our network analyzer report that bind is responding to a.root-server.net in 30 sec. does your server respond to a.root-servers.net, or does a.root-servers.net respond to your BIND? Cause all the packets are having the same source por

Re: slow non-cached quries

2011-09-09 Thread TMK
On Sep 8, 2011 1:31 PM, "TMK" wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:13 PM, TMK wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:06 PM, TMK wrote: > >> > >>> Message: 1 > >>> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:05:42 +0200 > >> > >>> From: TMK > >>> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: slow non-cached quries > >>> To: bind-users@lists.

Re: DiG "unexpected source" with a Subnet-Router anycast address

2011-09-09 Thread François-Xavier Le Bail
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Kevin Darcy wrote: > Why are you trying to use the SRAA > for DNS resolution? SRAA has a > special meaning to network-infrastructure devices; I don't > think it was > ever intended for anycasting general network services. Just > pick one of > your global-unicast address, an