Re: Clients get DNS timeouts because ipv6 means more queries for each lookup

2011-07-12 Thread Jonathan Kamens
On 07/13/2011 02:13 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: No. The fix is to correct the nameservers. They are not correctly following the DNS protocol and everything else is a fall out from that. You're right that everything else is fallout from that. But that doesn't do me much good, does it? It's my syst

Re: Clients get DNS timeouts because ipv6 means more queries for each lookup

2011-07-12 Thread Mark Andrews
No. The fix is to correct the nameservers. They are not correctly following the DNS protocol and everything else is a fall out from that. > Well, all the prodding from people here prompted me to investigate > further exactly what's going on. The problem isn't what I thought it > was. It appea

Re: Clients get DNS timeouts because ipv6 means more queries for each lookup

2011-07-12 Thread Jonathan Kamens
Well, all the prodding from people here prompted me to investigate further exactly what's going on. The problem isn't what I thought it was. It appears to be a bug in glibc, and I've filed a bug report and found a workaround. In a nutshell, the getaddrinfo function in glibc sends both A and AA

Re: SPF implementation schedule.

2011-07-12 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 kalpesh varyani wrote: > Looking at zytrix and spf2 sites, it seems that SPF is yet to be > implemented at functional level. If my understanding of that sentence is correct, then the sentence is not correct. SPF is implemented by (1) Publication of TXT or SPF reco

Re: rankstel.net (was: SPF implementation schedule.)

2011-07-12 Thread Eivind Olsen
Mahmud wrote: > I have fallen in problem with my dns server. Some times , some specific > domain can't resolve. From log report (/var/log/messages) i have given log > for that. > Jul 12 11:17:44 ns1 named[14948]: client 178.33.222.134#38772: query > (cache) 'rankstel.net/MX/IN' denied > Jul 12 11

Re: SPF implementation schedule.

2011-07-12 Thread Torinthiel
On 2011-07-12 11:07, almah...@ranksitt.net wrote: Hi, I have fallen in problem with my dns server. Some times , some specific domain can't resolve. From log report (/var/log/messages) i have given log for that. And what does this has in common with the thread you've replied to? Jul 12 11:17

Re: SPF implementation schedule.

2011-07-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.07.11 15:07, almah...@ranksitt.net wrote: I have fallen in problem with my dns server. Some times , some specific domain can't resolve. From log report (/var/log/messages) i have given log for that. Jul 12 11:17:44 ns1 named[14948]: client 178.33.222.134#38772: query (cache) 'rankstel.ne

Re: SPF implementation schedule.

2011-07-12 Thread almahmud
Hi, I have fallen in problem with my dns server. Some times , some specific domain can't resolve. From log report (/var/log/messages) i have given log for that. Jul 12 11:17:44 ns1 named[14948]: client 178.33.222.134#38772: query (cache) 'rankstel.net/MX/IN' denied Jul 12 11:17:45 ns1 named[149

Re: SPF implementation schedule.

2011-07-12 Thread Torinthiel
On 2011-07-12 10:07, kalpesh varyani wrote: Looking at zytrix and spf2 sites, it seems that SPF is yet to be implemented at functional level. RFC4408 documentation suggests method to implement SPF. However, I need to know if ISC is planning to provide support for SPF at client and/or server side.

Re: SPF implementation schedule.

2011-07-12 Thread kalpesh varyani
Looking at zytrix and spf2 sites, it seems that SPF is yet to be implemented at functional level. RFC4408 documentation suggests method to implement SPF. However, I need to know if ISC is planning to provide support for SPF at client and/or server side. Will anyone from ISC like to comment? On Mo