Re: why bind unable to find log files

2011-06-11 Thread Robert Spangler
On Saturday 11 June 2011 09:53, the following was written: > On Jun 11, 2011, at 4:22 AM, kshitij mali wrote: > > Hi Mark , > > > > Thanks of taking intreast in my case , yes the rhel4 default bind named > > service is running in chroot jail , know tell we what config changes do > > i nedd

Re: why bind unable to find log files

2011-06-11 Thread Warren Kumari
On Jun 11, 2011, at 4:22 AM, kshitij mali wrote: > Hi Mark , > > Thanks of taking intreast in my case , yes the rhel4 default bind named > service is running in chroot jail , know tell we what config changes do i > nedd to change. > Create a directory inside the chroot jail called var/log/

Re: primary and secondary running different versions

2011-06-11 Thread Eivind Olsen
Timo Veith wrote: > will there arise any problems between primary and secondary if they > run on different bind versions? In general no, I wouldn't expect any problems, at least not if you're running a fairly plain setup (no DLZ database backends etc.) When that is said, there is the possibility

Re: why bind unable to find log files

2011-06-11 Thread kshitij mali
Hi Mark , Thanks of taking intreast in my case , yes the rhel4 default bind named service is running in chroot jail , know tell we what config changes do i nedd to change. Regards, Kshitij On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > Are you starting named with -t ? If so you nee

primary and secondary running different versions

2011-06-11 Thread Timo Veith
Hello, will there arise any problems between primary and secondary if they run on different bind versions? The background of this question is: we are about to upgrade from Debian Lenny to Squeeze. And there will be some amount of time where they will be running on different versions. Debian Lenn