tools for searching/removing stale keys

2011-02-24 Thread Antonio Querubin
Has anyone come up with scripts/tools for removing stale zone-signing keys but leaving key-signing keys which are in the same directory alone? Antonio Querubin e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lis

RE: Threaded bind on CentOS

2011-02-24 Thread Jack Tavares
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Thompson [mailto:c...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Chris > Thompson > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 1:21 PM > To: Jack Tavares > Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Re: Threaded bind on CentOS > > On Feb 24 2011, Jack Tavares wrote: > > >I am

Re: Threaded bind on CentOS

2011-02-24 Thread Chris Thompson
On Feb 24 2011, Jack Tavares wrote: I am using bind 9.7.3 and I have tried running it with various -n values and it appears that I will always get n+3 threads. Ex: I run it: named -n 1 I get 4 threads named -n 4 I get 7 threads etc. I understand the desire to have background "housekeeping" t

RE: Threaded bind on CentOS

2011-02-24 Thread Jack Tavares
> -Original Message- > From: bind-users-bounces+j.tavares=f5@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind- > users-bounces+j.tavares=f5@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Eivind Olsen > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 11:46 AM > To: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Re: Threaded bind on CentOS > > >

Re: Threaded bind on CentOS

2011-02-24 Thread Eivind Olsen
> I am using bind 9.7.3 and I have tried running it with > various -n values and it appears that I will always get > n+3 threads. I haven't tried this myself on CentOS, but.. How do you verify the amount of threads? Checking with ps / top? What does BIND log when it starts up? Normally it should l

Threaded bind on CentOS

2011-02-24 Thread Jack Tavares
I am using bind 9.7.3 and I have tried running it with various -n values and it appears that I will always get n+3 threads. Ex: I run it: named -n 1 I get 4 threads named -n 4 I get 7 threads etc. I understand the desire to have background "housekeeping" threads, but I would like to know what,

Re: root zone initial key in bind.keys

2011-02-24 Thread Florian Weimer
* Kevin Oberman: >> If anyone is out there who wants to be using ISC DLV but does not want to >> use the root key, comment the root key out of bind.keys. > > I would really hoe that the set described above is an empty set. It's not. We know because there is a zone availability issue in BIND 9.6-