> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:45:06 -0500
> From: "Lightner, Jeff"
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
> IIRC the U.S. Government last year or the year before mandated all their
> sites be DNSSEC compliant by early this year. Maybe it is just a sign
> they are actually doin
Just had one of our authoritative servers crash with a similar error:
17-Feb-2011 10:28:18.814 general: critical: rbtdb.c:1566:
INSIST(((unsigned int)((&(node)->references)->refs)) == 0 && node->data
== ((void *)0)) failed
17-Feb-2011 10:28:18.838 general: critical: exiting (due to assertion
failu
IIRC the U.S. Government last year or the year before mandated all their
sites be DNSSEC compliant by early this year. Maybe it is just a sign
they are actually doing it.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=wat
> Is there a way I can use $GENERATE to generate PTR records for the whole
> of 10.0.0.0/8 in one line?
Disclaimer: I haven't ever really bothered with $GENERATE. But by reading
the BIND 9.7 ARM, it does seem to be aimed at doing the job for /24
segments, not /8.
Pre-generating a static list of P
On 2/17/2011 10:20 AM, Mark Watts wrote:
>
> Is there a way I can use $GENERATE to generate PTR records for the whole
> of 10.0.0.0/8 in one line?
No. There is not.
I must ask -- do you REALLY need to fill all of a /8? What is the
requirement for this?
AlanC
signature.asc
Description: Open
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a way I can use $GENERATE to generate PTR records for the whole
of 10.0.0.0/8 in one line?
Mark.
- --
Mark Watts BSc RHCE
Senior Systems Engineer, MSS Secure Managed Hosting
www.QinetiQ.com
QinetiQ - Delivering customer-focused solutions
G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Glad to hear it was a help.
Does anyone happen to know if anything changed for .gov addresses just
last week? This problem appears to have come out of the clear blue sky
(not that there wasn't plenty of warning) so I have to assume that
something was
We have checked list archives and our side has increased the allowed DNS
packet size. Now we are fine to get correct answer for **.gov.
Thanks for help and Best Regards,
Xiao
2/17/2011
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+xhuang=graphnet@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-b
8 matches
Mail list logo